Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479817›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2019

Mechanical testing setups affect spine segment fracture outcomes.

Asghar Rezaei, Hugo Giambini, Kent D Carlson, Hao Xu, Susheil Uthamaraj, Dan Dragomir-Daescu, Michael J Yaszemski, Lichun Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Asghar RezaeiDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hugo GiambiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Kent D CarlsonDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hao XuDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Susheil UthamarajDivision of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dan Dragomir-DaescuDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michael J YaszemskiDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lichun LuDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: lu.lichun@mayo.edu.

Funding

Metastatic Spine Tumors: Minimally Invasive Fracture Risk Analysis and Treatment - MasterR01AR056212 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Benjamin D Elder, Lichun Lu · 2008 to 2026
$6.2M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesTL1TR000137 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000137NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the work presented here was to establish an experimental testing configuration that would generate a bending compression fracture in a laboratory setting. To this end, we designed and fabricated a fixture to accommodate a three level spine segment and to be able to perform mechanical testing by applying an off-centric compressive loading to create a flexion-type motion. Forces and moments occurring during testing were measured with a six-channel load cell. The initial testing configuration (Fixture A) included plates connected to the superior potted vertebral body and to the ball-socket joint of the testing system ram. Surprisingly, while all cadaveric specimens underwent a similar off-centric compressive loading, most of the specimens showed extension outcomes as opposed to the intended pure-flexion motion. The extension was due to fixture size and weight; by applying an off-centric load directly on the top plate, unintended large shear forces were generated. To resolve the issue, several modifications were made to the original fixture configuration. These modifications included the removal of the superior plates and the implementation of wedges at the superior surface of the fixture (Fixture B). A synthetic sample was used during this modification phase to minimize the number of cadaveric specimens while optimizing the process. The best outcomes were consistently observed when a 15°-wedge was used to provide flexion-type loading. Cadaveric specimens were then experimentally tested to fracture using the modified testing configuration (Fixture B). A comparison between both fixtures, A and B, revealed that almost all biomechanical parameters, including force, moment, and displacement data, were affected by the testing setup. These results suggest that fixture design and implementation for testing is of extreme importance, and can influence the fracture properties and affect the intended motion.

Indexed as

Fracture HealingAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone PlatesCadaverCompressive StrengthFemaleHumansMaleMaterials TestingMechanical PhenomenaMiddle AgedMotionRange of Motion, ArticularRotationShear StrengthBiomechanical analysisFlexion bending momentMechanical testing fixtureSpine fractureSpine motion segment

Identifiers

PMID31479817
PMCPMC8686181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.