Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479781›Full record

Observational studyThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2020

Comparison of brain structure between pain-susceptible and asymptomatic individuals following experimental induction of low back pain.

Jeff Boissoneault, Charles W Penza, Steven Z George, Michael E Robinson, Mark D Bishop

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeff BoissoneaultDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Charles W PenzaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Miami Veteran's Affairs Health System, Miami, FL, USA.
Steven Z GeorgeDuke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, NC, USA.
Michael E RobinsonDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mark D BishopCenter for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100154, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Electronic address: bish@phhp.ufl.edu.
University of Florida Health · USDuke University · USMiami VA Healthcare System · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Central Mechanisms of Body Based Intervention for Musculoskeletal Low Back PainR01AT006334 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BISHOP, MARK D. · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
CENTRAL MECHANISMS OF MANIPULATIVE AND BODY-BASED INTERVENTIONS: TRAINING PROGRAMF32AT007729 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PENZA, CHARLES W · 2013 to 2015
$200k
NCCIH NIH HHS F32 AT007729NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT006334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextPeripheral differences often do not adequately account for variation in reports of pain intensity in people with musculoskeletal pain. PURPOSE: Here we sought to determine the extent to which structural differences in the brain (grey matter density) of pain free individuals might relate to subsequent pain (or lack thereof) after standardized peripheral muscle injury (ie, micro trauma from high intensity exercise). STUDY

designThis was an observational laboratory-based study that was a secondary analysis from a larger trial.

methodsParticipants completed baseline testing (functional MRI and quantitative pain testing) followed by high intensity trunk exercise to induce delayed onset muscle soreness in the erector spinae. Forty-eight hours later, back pain intensity ratings were collected and all participants were re-imaged. Grey matter density was determined using voxel-based morphometry. The "asymptomatic" group (no reports of any pain within 48 hours after induction) to a 'pain' group (rating of pain at rest and movement pf>20 on a 101-point numeric rating scale).

resultsOur results revealed several large clusters where, compared to participants with pain, asymptomatic participants had significant greater grey matter density. These brain regions included left medial frontal gyrus, left middle occipital gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and right superior frontal gyrus.

conclusionsLower grey matter density in brain regions previously linked to discriminative, emotional, and cognitive aspects of cortical processing are associated with reporting musculoskeletal pain after a standardized peripheral muscle injury. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Cortical gray matter density of people without any pain may influence response to a standardized high intensity exercise protocol. This finding adds further support to the relevance of central factors in explaining the tremendous individual variability in pain report following acute musculoskeletal injury.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainFemaleGray MatterHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedCortexGrey matterImagingPain

Identifiers

PMID31479781
PMCPMC6995409
OpenAlexW2971215130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.