Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479610›Full record

ReviewBioconjugate chemistry2020

Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy: Photoactivatable Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs).

Hisataka Kobayashi, Gary L Griffiths, Peter L Choyke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) of bone metastases.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Article
  13. Cutaneous Lymphoma and Antibody-Directed Therapies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hisataka KobayashiMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research , National Cancer Institute , MSC 1002, 10 Center Drive , Bethesda , Maryland 20892-1002 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1019-4112
Gary L GriffithsClinical Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research , Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute , P.O. Box B, Frederick , Maryland 21702-1201 , United States.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research , National Cancer Institute , MSC 1002, 10 Center Drive , Bethesda , Maryland 20892-1002 , United States.
National Cancer Institute · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Growth Factor Imaging and PhotoimmunotherapyZIABC010656 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2024
$31.6M
Cancer-cell specific therapy: photo-immunotherapyZIABC011513 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KOBAYASHI, HISATAKA · 2013 to 2025
$15.5M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011513NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer treatment has been founded traditionally on the three approaches of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy with the latter recognized as the obvious systemic treatment approach applicable to disease that has spread. Although significant progress has been made over nearly 100 years of developing systemic treatments, it remains clear that use of the toxic agents involved is a two-edged sword with normal organ toxicities always needing to be balanced with and against administration of relevant therapeutic doses. With the advent of monoclonal antibodies targeted against tumor-associated antigens that could be used as carriers of potently toxic chemotherapy drugs, it was thought that such antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) could engender the answer to the toxicity/therapeutic equation by shifting the equation more toward beneficial therapeutic efficacy. However, over 40 or so years, antibody-drug conjugates have not significantly affected the toxicity/therapy balance paradigm in most cancer indications, especially in solid tumors. Ideally, a further step may be required in that a non-tumor-targeted antibody-drug conjugate should be essentially nontoxic in its native administered form, with toxic effects unleashed only at the site of targeted tumors. A new approach that employs this principle is the use of an antibody-drug conjugate that is essentially nontoxic to normal tissues by virtue of requiring an extra step of light activation to become potent. We describe the preclinical data and first clinical results gained over the past few years by use of antibody-drug conjugates wherein the drug comprises a near-infrared photoactivatable dye delivered to tumors by a monoclonal antibody and is subsequently activated to a toxic entity solely at sites of tumors.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalHumansImmunoconjugatesImmunotherapyNeoplasmsPhototherapyAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID31479610
PMCPMC7414968
OpenAlexW2971630275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.