Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479590›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in human genetics2019

Encoding Clinical Data with the Human Phenotype Ontology for Computational Differential Diagnostics.

Sebastian Köhler, N Christine Øien, Orion J Buske, Tudor Groza, Julius O B Jacobsen, Craig McNamara, Nicole Vasilevsky, Leigh C Carmody, J P Gourdine, Michael Gargano and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA): a genetic resource for vertebrate animals.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. GA4GH Phenopackets: A Practical Introduction.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sebastian KöhlerCharité Centrum für Therapieforschung, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
N Christine ØienFreelance Genome Analyst, Berlin, Germany.
Orion J BuskeGene42, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tudor GrozaPryzm Health, Perth, Australia.
Julius O B JacobsenMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Craig McNamaraPryzm Health, Perth, Australia.
Nicole VasilevskyMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Leigh C CarmodyMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
J P GourdineMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Michael GarganoMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Julie A McMurryMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Daniel DanisMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Christopher J MungallMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Damian SmedleyMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Melissa HaendelMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).
Peter N RobinsonMonarch Initiative (monarchinitiative.org).

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
The Monarch Initiative: Linking Diseases to Model Organism ResourcesR24OD011883 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAENDEL, MELISSA A, MUNGALL, CHRISTOPHER J · 2012 to 2024
$16.0M
Forums for Integrative PhenomicsU13CA221044 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HAENDEL, MELISSA A, ROBINSON, PETER NICHOLAS · 2017 to 2019
$223k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NCI NIH HHS U13 CA221044NIH HHS R24 OD011883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) is a standardized set of phenotypic terms that are organized in a hierarchical fashion. It is a widely used resource for capturing human disease phenotypes for computational analysis to support differential diagnostics. The HPO is frequently used to create a set of terms that accurately describe the observed clinical abnormalities of an individual being evaluated for suspected rare genetic disease. This profile is compared with computational disease profiles in the HPO database with the aim of identifying genetic diseases with comparable phenotypic profiles. The computational analysis can be coupled with the analysis of whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing data through applications such as Exomiser. This article explains how to choose an optimal set of HPO terms for these cases and enter them with software, such as PhenoTips and PatientArchive, and demonstrates how to use Phenomizer and Exomiser to generate a computational differential diagnosis. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticSoftwareDiagnosis, DifferentialExomeGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansPhenotypeWhole Genome Sequencingdifferential diagnosisexomeHPOHuman Phenotype Ontologyphenotype

Identifiers

PMID31479590
PMCPMC6814016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.