Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479469›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparison of infectious agents detected from hatchery and wild juvenile Coho salmon in British Columbia, 2008-2018.

Omid Nekouei, Raphael Vanderstichel, Karia H Kaukinen, Krishna Thakur, Tobi Ming, David A Patterson, Marc Trudel, Chrys Neville, Kristina M Miller

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptome Analysis Indicates Immune Responses againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Omid NekoueiDepartment of Health Management, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2427-4159
Raphael VanderstichelDepartment of Health Management, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Karia H KaukinenPacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
Krishna ThakurDepartment of Health Management, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Tobi MingPacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
David A PattersonFisheries and Oceans Canada, Cooperative Resource Management Institute, School of Resources and Environment Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Marc TrudelSt. Andrews Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. Andrews, NB, Canada.
Chrys NevillePacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
Kristina M MillerPacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada · CAUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases are potential contributors to decline in Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) populations. Although pathogens are theoretically considered to pose higher risk in high-density rearing environments like hatcheries, there is no direct evidence that hatchery-origin Coho salmon increase the transmission of infectious agents to sympatric wild populations. This study was undertaken to compare prevalence, burden, and diversity of infectious agents between hatchery-reared and wild juvenile Coho salmon in British Columbia (BC), Canada. In total, 2,655 juvenile Coho salmon were collected between 2008 and 2018 from four regions of freshwater and saltwater in BC. High-throughput microfluidics qPCR was employed for simultaneous detection of 36 infectious agents from mixed-tissue samples (gill, brain, heart, liver, and kidney). Thirty-one agents were detected at least once, including ten with prevalence >5%. Candidatus Brachiomonas cysticola, Paraneuclospora theridion, and Parvicapsula pseudobranchiocola were the most prevalent agents. Diversity and burden of infectious agents were substantially higher in marine environment than in freshwater. In Mainland BC, infectious burden and diversity were significantly lower in hatchery smolts than in wild counterparts, whereas in other regions, there were no significant differences. Observed differences in freshwater were predominantly driven by three parasites, Loma salmonae, Myxobolus arcticus, and Parvicapsula kabatai. In saltwater, there were no consistent differences in agent prevalence between hatchery and wild fish shared among the west and east coasts of Vancouver Island. Although some agents showed differential infectious patterns between regions, annual variations likely contributed to this signal. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that hatchery smolts carry higher burdens of infectious agents than conspecific wild fish, reducing the potential risk of transfer to wild smolts at this life stage. Moreover, we provide a baseline of infectious agents in juvenile Coho salmon that will be used in future research and modeling potential correlations between infectious profiles and marine survival.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBritish ColumbiaBurkholderialesEnterocytozoonFish DiseasesFisheriesFresh WaterGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsMicrosporidiosisMyxozoaOncorhynchus kisutchParasitic Diseases, AnimalPrevalenceRisk FactorsSeawater

Identifiers

PMID31479469
PMCPMC6719873
OpenAlexW2971652485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.