Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479450›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Engineered action at a distance: Blood-meal-inducible paralysis in Aedes aegypti.

Roya Elaine Haghighat-Khah, Tim Harvey-Samuel, Sanjay Basu, Oliver StJohn, Sarah Scaife, Sebald Verkuijl, Erica Lovett, Luke Alphey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mimicking superinfection exclusion disrupts alphavirus infection and transmission in the yellow fever mosquitoProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. CRISPR-Mediated Genome Engineering in Aedes aegypti.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Botanical insecticide-based nanosystems for the control of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti larvae.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roya Elaine Haghighat-KhahDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tim Harvey-SamuelArthropod Genetics Group, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Sanjay BasuArthropod Genetics Group, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Oliver StJohnDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6771-0280
Sarah ScaifeImmunocore, Park Drive, United Kingdom.
Sebald VerkuijlArthropod Genetics Group, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Erica LovettArthropod Genetics Group, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.
Luke AlpheyArthropod Genetics Group, The Pirbright Institute, Woking, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2916-3802

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation suppression through mass-release of Aedes aegypti males carrying dominant-lethal transgenes has been demonstrated in the field. Where population dynamics show negative density-dependence, suppression can be enhanced if lethality occurs after the density-dependent (i.e. larval) stage. Existing molecular tools have limited current examples of such Genetic Pest Management (GPM) systems to achieving this through engineering 'cell-autonomous effectors' i.e. where the expressed deleterious protein is restricted to the cells in which it is expressed-usually under the control of the regulatory elements (e.g. promoter regions) used to build the system. This limits the flexibility of these technologies as regulatory regions with useful spatial, temporal or sex-specific expression patterns may only be employed if the cells they direct expression in are simultaneously sensitive to existing effectors, and also precludes the targeting of extracellular regions such as cell-surface receptors. Expanding the toolset to 'non-cell autonomous' effectors would significantly reduce these limitations. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe sought to engineer female-specific, late-acting lethality through employing the Ae. aegypti VitellogeninA1 promoter to drive blood-meal-inducible, fat-body specific expression of tTAV. Initial attempts using pro-apoptotic effectors gave no evident phenotype, potentially due to the lower sensitivity of terminally-differentiated fat-body cells to programmed-death signals. Subsequently, we dissociated the temporal and spatial expression of this system by engineering a novel synthetic effector (Scorpion neurotoxin-TetO-gp67.AaHIT) designed to be secreted out of the tissue in which it was expressed (fat-body) and then affect cells elsewhere (neuro-muscular junctions). This resulted in a striking, temporary-paralysis phenotype after blood-feeding. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results are significant in demonstrating for the first time an engineered 'action at a distance' phenotype in a non-model pest insect. The potential to dissociate temporal and spatial expression patterns of useful endogenous regulatory elements will extend to a variety of other pest insects and effectors.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBites and StingsFeeding BehaviorFemaleGenetic EngineeringHumansMaleMosquito ControlPromoter Regions, GeneticTransgenes

Identifiers

PMID31479450
PMCPMC6719823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.