SynthesisPloS one2019
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based computer programs to analyze chest x-rays for pulmonary tuberculosis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05989802 (Rapid Research in Diagnostics Development for Tuberculosis Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Rapid Research in Diagnostics Development for Tuberculosis Network (R2D2 Kids) and Assessing Diagnostics At Point-of-care for Tuberculosis in Children (ADAPT for Kids)
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-based prediction of tuberculosis treatment failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Tuberculosis Detection: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Machine and Deep Learning for Tuberculosis Detection on Chest X-Rays: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Wearable Devices Using Artificial Intelligence for Blood Glucose Level Forecasting or Prediction: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Chest X-ray Analysis With Deep Learning-Based Software as a Triage Test for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Pooled it
- Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra assays for screening for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults, irrespective of signs or symptoms.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Enhanced Tuberculosis Diagnosis With Computer-aided Chest X-ray and Urine Lipoarabinomannan in Adults With HIV Admitted to Hospital (CASTLE Study): A Cluster Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Trial
- Computer-aided X-ray screening for tuberculosis and HIV testing among adults with cough in Malawi (the PROSPECT study): A randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Trial
- AI-Enhanced Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases in Resource-Limited Settings: A Scoping Review.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2026Article
- AI/ML-based prediction of TB treatment failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Comprehensive Review on Diagnostic, Treatment, and Prevention Aspects.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Non-contact lung disease classification via orthogonal frequency division multiplexing-based passive 6G integrated sensing and communication.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted chest radiographs in tuberculosis screening: A Ghanaian clinical study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Beyond accuracy: evaluating the operational feasibility and diagnostic yield of CAD4TB vs. Timika score for scalable TB screening in low-resource settings.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- External Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Triaging System for Chest X-Rays: A Retrospective Independent Clinical Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an ultra-portable X-ray system with automated interpretation for tuberculosis active case finding in carceral settings: a diagnostic test accuracy study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Machine Learning in Identifying Drug Resistance in Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2025Review
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We undertook a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based software for identification of radiologic abnormalities (computer-aided detection, or CAD) compatible with pulmonary tuberculosis on chest x-rays (CXRs). We searched four databases for articles published between January 2005-February 2019. We summarized data on CAD type, study design, and diagnostic accuracy. We assessed risk of bias with QUADAS-2. We included 53 of the 4712 articles reviewed: 40 focused on CAD design methods ("Development" studies) and 13 focused on evaluation of CAD ("Clinical" studies). Meta-analyses were not performed due to methodological differences. Development studies were more likely to use CXR databases with greater potential for bias as compared to Clinical studies. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (median AUC [IQR]) were significantly higher: in Development studies AUC: 0.88 [0.82-0.90]) versus Clinical studies (0.75 [0.66-0.87]; p-value 0.004); and with deep-learning (0.91 [0.88-0.99]) versus machine-learning (0.82 [0.75-0.89]; p = 0.001). We conclude that CAD programs are promising, but the majority of work thus far has been on development rather than clinical evaluation. We provide concrete suggestions on what study design elements should be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.