Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479351›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2019

In Low- And Middle-Income Countries, Is Delivery In High-Quality Obstetric Facilities Geographically Feasible?

Anna D Gage, Fei Carnes, Jeff Blossom, Jalemba Aluvaala, Archana Amatya, Kishori Mahat, Address Malata, Sanam Roder-DeWan, Nana Twum-Danso, Talhiya Yahya and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna D GageAnna D. Gage ( agage@hsph.harvard.edu ) is a student in the Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, in Boston, Massachusetts.
Fei CarnesFei Carnes is a geographic information systems (GIS) specialist in the Center for Geographic Analyses, Harvard University, in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jeff BlossomJeff Blossom is the GIS service manager in the Center for Geographic Analyses, Harvard University.
Jalemba AluvaalaJalemba Aluvaala is a research fellow in the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi School of Medicine, in Kenya.
Archana AmatyaArchana Amatya is an assistant professor of community medicine and public health at the Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, in Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kishori MahatKishori Mahat is an advisor in Quality Assurance and Regulation, Nepal Health Sector Support Programme, Department for International Development, in Kathmandu.
Address MalataAddress Malata is principal of the College of Nursing, Malawi University of Science and Technology, in Limbe.
Sanam Roder-DeWanSanam Roder-DeWan is a researcher in the Ifakara Health Institute, in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Nana Twum-DansoNana Twum-Danso is CEO of MAZA, in Accra, Ghana.
Talhiya YahyaTalhiya Yahya is head of the Quality Management Unit, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, in Dar es Salaam.
Margaret E KrukMargaret E. Kruk is an associate professor in the Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery in a health facility is a key strategy for reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, yet increasing use of facilities has not consistently translated into reduced mortality in low- and middle-income countries. In such countries, many deliveries occur at primary care facilities, where the quality of care is poor. We modeled the geographic feasibility of service delivery redesign that shifted deliveries from primary care clinics to hospitals in six countries: Haiti, Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Nepal, and Tanzania. We estimated the proportion of women within two hours of the nearest delivery facility, both currently and under redesign. Today, 83-100 percent of pregnant women in the study countries have two-hour access to a delivery facility. A policy of redesign would reduce two-hour access by at most 10 percent, ranging from 0.6 percent in Malawi to 9.9 percent in Tanzania. Relocating delivery services to hospitals would not unduly impede geographic access to care in the study countries. This policy should be considered in low- and middle-income countries, as it may be an effective approach to reducing maternal and newborn deaths.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesObstetricsQuality of Health CareFemaleHaitiHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansKenyaMalawiNamibiaNepalPregnancyQuality ImprovementTanzaniafacility deliveryhealth systemsmaternal healthnewborn healthquality of care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.