Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31478989›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2020

Transfusion of Anaerobically or Conventionally Stored Blood After Hemorrhagic Shock.

Alexander T Williams, Vivek P Jani, Travis Nemkov, Alfredo Lucas, Tatsuro Yoshida, Andrew Dunham, Angelo D'Alessandro, Pedro Cabrales

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05549232 (A Single Center, Pilot Clinical Investigation of Surgical Bleeding in Burn Patients, and Chronically Transfused Patients With Haematologic Malignancies, Who Are Transfused With Hypoxic Red Blood Cells Manufactured With Hemanext ONE System), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05549232 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Single Center, Pilot Clinical Investigation of Surgical Bleeding in Burn Patients, and Chronically Transfused Patients With Haematologic Malignancies, Who Are Transfused With Hypoxic Red Blood Cells Manufactured With Hemanext ONE System

TypeobservationalSponsorHemanextRan2022 to 2024Enrolled22ConditionsHematologic Neoplasms, BurnsArmsHypoxic Red Blood Cells
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. High-Throughput Metabolomics in Transfusion Medicine.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Red Blood Cell Omics and Machine Learning in Transfusion Medicine: Singularity Is Near.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  16. Prony Analysis of Left Ventricle Pressure and Volume.Medical engineering & physics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Omics Markers of Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Trauma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander T WilliamsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Vivek P JaniDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Travis NemkovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
Alfredo LucasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Tatsuro YoshidaHemanext, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Andrew DunhamHemanext, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Angelo D'AlessandroDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
Pedro CabralesDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Hemanext (United States) · USLa Jolla Bioengineering Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Translational Pulmonary Vascular Biology ProgramT32HL007171 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Sonia Castro Flores, Tim Lahm · 1985 to 2026
$9.4M
Integrative Bioengineering of Heart, Vessels, and BloodT32HL105373 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHIEN, SHU, INTAGLIETTA, MARCOS · 2010 to 2019
$3.6M
PEGylated megahemoglobin for use as a red blood cell substituteR01HL138116 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CABRALES, PEDRO, KAUMAYA, PRAVIN T. P. · 2017 to 2020
$2.9M
Attenuating the Oxidative and Myocardial Side-Effects of Acellular HemoglobinR01HL126945 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CABRALES, PEDRO, PALMER, ANDRE FRANCIS · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126945NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL138116NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007171NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL105373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResuscitation from hemorrhagic shock (HS) by blood transfusion restores oxygen (O2) delivery and provides hemodynamic stability. Current regulations allow red blood cells (RBCs) to be stored and used for up to 42 days. During storage, RBCs undergo many structural and functional changes. These storage lesions have been associated with adverse events and increased mortality after transfusion, increasing the need for improved RBC storage protocols. This study evaluates the efficacy of anaerobically stored RBCs to resuscitate rats from severe HS compared with conventionally stored RBCs. METHODS AND

resultsRat RBCs were stored under anaerobic, anaerobic/hypercapnic, or conventional conditions for a period of 3 weeks. Hemorrhage was induced by controlled bleeding, shock was maintained for 30 min, and RBCs were transfused to restore and maintain blood pressure near the prhemorrhage level. All storage conditions met current regulatory 24-h posttransfusion recovery requirements. Transfusion of anaerobically stored RBCs required significantly less RBC volume to restore and maintain hemodynamics. Anaerobic or anaerobic/hypercapnic RBCs restored hemodynamics better than conventionally stored RBCs. Resuscitation with conventionally stored RBCs impaired indices of left ventricular cardiac function, increased hypoxic tissue staining and inflammatory markers, and affected organ function compared with anaerobically stored RBCs.

conclusionsResuscitation from HS via transfusion of anaerobically stored RBCs recovered cardiac function, restored hemodynamic stability, and improved outcomes.

Indexed as

ErythrocytesErythrocyte TransfusionOxygenAnimalsBlood PreservationDisease Models, AnimalMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyShock, HemorrhagicOxygen

Identifiers

PMID31478989
PMCPMC7017949
OpenAlexW2971532346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.