Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31478919›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2019

Using Patients' Social Network to Improve Compliance to Outpatient Screening Colonoscopy Appointments Among Blacks: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Adeyinka O Laiyemo, John Kwagyan, Carla D Williams, Jessica Rogers, Angesom Kibreab, Momodu A Jack, Edward E Lee, Hassan Brim, Hassan Ashktorab, Charles D Howell and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adeyinka O LaiyemoDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
John KwagyanDesign, Biostatistics and Population Studies for Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translations Science, Washington, DC, USA.
Carla D WilliamsDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Jessica RogersDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Angesom KibreabDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Momodu A JackDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Edward E LeeDepartment of Pathology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Hassan BrimDepartment of Pathology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Hassan AshktorabDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Charles D HowellDepartment of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Duane T SmootDepartment of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Elizabeth A PlatzDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Improving attendance to outpatient endoscopy appointments among blacksR21DK100875 · NIDDK · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI LAIYEMO, ADEYINKA O · 2014 to 2015
$415k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK100875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatient navigation improves colorectal cancer screening among underserved populations, but limited resources preclude widespread adoption in minority-serving institutions. We evaluated whether a patient's self-selected social contact person can effectively facilitate outpatient screening colonoscopy.

methodsFrom September 2014 to March 2017 in an urban tertiary center, 399 black participants scheduled for outpatient screening colonoscopy self-selected a social contact person to be a facilitator and provided the person's phone number. Of these, 201 participants (50.4%) were randomly assigned to the intervention arm for their social contact persons to be engaged by phone. The study was explained to the social contact person with details about colonoscopy screening and bowel preparation process. The social contacts were asked to assist the participants, provide support, and encourage compliance with the procedures. The social contact person was not contacted in the usual care arm, n = 198 (49.6%). We evaluated attendance to the scheduled outpatient colonoscopy and adequacy of bowel preparation. Analysis was performed by intention to treat.

resultsThe social contact person was reached and agreed to be involved for 130 of the 201 participants (64.7%). No differences were found in the proportion of participants who underwent screening colonoscopy (77.3% vs 77.2%; relative risk = 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.91-1.12), but there was a modest increase in the proportion with adequate bowel preparation with social contact involvement (89.1% vs 80.9%; relative risk = 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.21). DISCUSSION: Engaging a patient's social network to serve in the role of a patient navigator did not improve compliance to outpatient screening colonoscopy but modestly improved the adequacy of bowel preparation.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingAmbulatory CareBlack or African AmericanCatharticsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOutpatientsPatient CompliancePatient NavigationPolyethylene GlycolsCatharticsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID31478919
PMCPMC6776677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.