Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31478704›Full record

ArticlePsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2020

Reinforcer pathology: Narrative of hurricane-associated loss increases delay discounting, demand, and consumption of highly palatable snacks in the obese.

Sarah E Snider, Alexandra M Mellis, Lindsey M Poe, Matthew A Kocher, Jamie K Turner, Warren K Bickel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reinforcer pathology's alternative reinforcer hypothesis: A preliminary examination.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  20. Behavioral economic cigarette demand among individuals who smoke with and without obesity.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah E SniderAddiction Recovery Research Center.
Alexandra M MellisAddiction Recovery Research Center.
Lindsey M PoeAddiction Recovery Research Center.
Matthew A KocherGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health.
Jamie K TurnerAddiction Recovery Research Center.ORCID 0000-0002-3810-0678
Warren K BickelAddiction Recovery Research Center.

Funding

Delay discounting as a target for self-regulation in prediabetesUH2DK109543 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2015 to 2017
$2.4M
Delay discounting as a target for self-regulation in prediabetesUH3DK109543 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2018 to 2019
$2.0M
Fralin Biomedical Research InstituteNational Institutes of Health; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNIDDK NIH HHS UH2 DK109543NIDDK NIH HHS UH3 DK109543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinforcer pathology is derived from the integration of two measures: (a) self-control (i.e., delay discounting), and (b) reward valuation (i.e., behavioral economic demand). Narrative theory asserts that vividly imagining oneself in a hypothetical, yet realistic, scenario can acutely alter decision making, valuation of reinforcers such as food, and how much food is consumed. The present study measured changes in reinforcer pathology for highly palatable snacks following either a negative or neutral scenario in obese individuals. Participants (N = 48), with a body mass index of 30 or greater, rated their liking of 7 calorie-dense snack items and completed discounting and purchase demand tasks for their top-rated snack. Participants then read a randomly assigned hypothetical scenario (i.e., a devastating hurricane [negative] or minor storm [neutral]), completed the tasks again, and were given ad libitum access to their top 3 ranked snack foods. Results indicated that delay discounting, demand for participants' top-rated snack food, and negative affect all increased in the hurricane group compared with the minor storm group. The hurricane group also consumed more calories, even when hunger was standardized with a preload meal bar. Consistent with reinforcer pathology, these results suggest that vivid consideration of a devastating scenario constricts the temporal window and increases demand for hedonic snack foods among obese individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cyclonic StormsDelay DiscountingSnacksAdultChoice BehaviorDecision MakingEconomics, BehavioralFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansHungerMaleMiddle AgedNarrationObesityRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID31478704
PMCPMC7007323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.