ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2019
[Pain situation among older adults in need of care in the outpatient care setting and cognitively or physically unable to respond : Challenges and recommendations].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The use of nonpharmacological interventions for chronic pain treatment in community-dwelling older adults with a certified need for care.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- [More pain assessment in individuals with advanced dementia! : Appropriate treatment is not possible without targeted observation].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-reporting is the gold standard in pain assessment. However, this is not possible among adults who are unable to respond. Thus, the method of choice is to observe behavior in order to assess pain. Nurses rarely conduct pain observations because they do not feel educated enough to use such tools in vulnerable groups. The aim of the study is to analyze the pain situation among older adults (≥65 years) in need of care who are cognitively or physically unable to respond in the outpatient care setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur cross-sectional study is based on data from ACHE, a study on pain in outpatient older adults in need of care. Of 355 care-dependent older adults with chronic pain, 81 (22.8%) who were unable to respond received a pain assessment with the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD, German: Beurteilung von Schmerz bei Demenz [BESD]) scale.
resultsThe study population (n = 81) was very old (mean age = 84.2 years), female (77.8%), and widowed (50.0%). We observed pain-related behavior among 61.7% of older adults in need of care. The mean BESD score was 2.8 ± 2.5 (range 0-8). We identified a significant difference in the BESD score observed calmly (mean = 1.7 ± 2.5) and under mobilization (mean = 3.4 ± 2.3, p = 0.001). Moreover, only 21 older adults in need of care received a pain assessment 4 weeks prior to our study.
conclusionOur findings indicate a deficit in regularly conducted pain assessment among older adults who are unable to respond and are in need of care in the outpatient care setting. An observation tool in that setting is urgently needed and would be a first step in optimizing pain assessment. We recommend conducting observations during regular nursing mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31478144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.