ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020
Laparoscopic complete sacrocolpopexy mesh removal for right-sided gluteal pain and recurrent mesh erosion.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spondylodiscitis after sacral colpopexy: diagnose early to treat earlier.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2024Review
- Laparoscopic partial sacrocolpopexy mesh resection due to mesh infection.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aim of videoThe aim was to demonstrate laparoscopic complete excision of sacrocolpopexy mesh from a 65-year-old woman who had presented with delayed onset of persistent right-sided gluteal pain.
methodThe patient was referred to our unit, having undergone a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse 7 years earlier, with a type 1 polypropylene mesh. Four years after the primary surgery, she first noticed symptoms of spontaneous vaginal pain together with deep dyspareunia, and right-sided gluteal pain. Clinical examination revealed mesh erosion at the vaginal vault. This was managed at her local hospital, with excision of the small exposed portion of the mesh and over sewing, from a vaginal approach. She continued to be symptomatic following this procedure. When her symptoms still failed to improve 3 years later, a tertiary referral was made to our unit. At laparoscopy, minimal adhesions between the bowel and the mesh were noted and divided. After carefully dissecting the right ureter and reflecting the bladder, the entire sacrocolpopexy mesh was removed with its ProTack fasteners. The entire specimen was retrieved in one piece through the open vault and the vagina was sutured with 2.0 <monocryl laparoscopically. Surgical steps begin with laparoscopic survey of the anatomy. Adhesions need to be released carefully, after developing proper surgical planes. On follow-up in clinic 12 weeks later, there was complete resolution of her symptoms, with minimal vault descent.
conclusionThis video demonstrates the steps needed to undertake complete laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy mesh excision, which should be feasible for skilled laparoscopists. This approach has advantages over the open approach, with good access and visualisation of the entire course of the mesh, and more rapid recovery for the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.