Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31478028›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017.

Asaf Bitton, Jocelyn Fifield, Hannah Ratcliffe, Ami Karlage, Hong Wang, Jeremy H Veillard, Dan Schwarz, Lisa R Hirschhorn

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Barriers to Community-Based Primary Health Care Delivery in Urban China: A Systematic Mapping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Development of the Respiratory System During Adolescence.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Asaf BittonAriadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3633-3806
Jocelyn FifieldAriadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-1465
Hannah RatcliffeAriadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ami KarlageAriadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hong WangThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jeremy H VeillardWorld Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Dan SchwarzAriadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6975-4519
Lisa R HirschhornAriadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-7437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 2018 Astana Declaration reaffirmed global commitment to primary healthcare (PHC) as a core strategy to achieve universal health coverage. To meet this potential, PHC in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) needs to be strengthened, but research is lacking and fragmented. We conducted a scoping review of the recent literature to assess the state of research on PHC in LMIC and understand where future research is most needed.

methodsGuided by the Primary Healthcare Performance Initiative (PHCPI) conceptual framework, we conducted searches of the peer-reviewed literature on PHC in LMIC published between 2010 (the publication year of the last major review of PHC in LMIC) and 2017. We also conducted country-specific searches to understand performance trajectories in 14 high-performing countries identified in the previous review. Evidence highlights and gaps for each topic area of the PHCPI framework were extracted and summarised.

resultsWe retrieved 5219 articles, 207 of which met final inclusion criteria. Many PHC system inputs such as payment and workforce are well-studied. A number of emerging service delivery innovations have early evidence of success but lack evidence for how to scale more broadly. Community-based PHC systems with supportive governmental policies and financing structures (public and private) consistently promote better outcomes and equity. Among the 14 highlighted countries, most maintained or improved progress in the scope of services, quality, access and financial coverage of PHC during the review time period.

conclusionOur findings revealed a heterogeneous focus of recent literature, with ample evidence for effective PHC policies, payment and other system inputs. More variability was seen in key areas of service delivery, underscoring a need for greater emphasis on implementation science and intervention testing. Future evaluations are needed on PHC system capacities and orientation toward social accountability, innovation, management and population health in order to achieve the promise of PHC.

Indexed as

health policyhealth systemspublic healthreview

Identifiers

PMID31478028
PMCPMC6703296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.