Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477926›Full record

ReviewNature biotechnology2019

Emerging technologies for improved deep brain stimulation.

Hayriye Cagnan, Timothy Denison, Cameron McIntyre, Peter Brown

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 129 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biocompatible Magnetopyroelectric Composite Films for Cell Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Prefrontal Network Mechanisms of Psychiatric Deep Brain Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hayriye CagnanMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. hayriye.cagnan@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.
Timothy DenisonMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cameron McIntyreSchool of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Peter BrownMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit · GBCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Understanding the effects of deep brain stimulation on cortical processingR01NS086100 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MCINTYRE, CAMERON, TAYLOR, DAWN MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_12024/1Medical Research Council MR/R020418/1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for common movement disorders and has been used to modulate neural activity through delivery of electrical stimulation to key brain structures. The long-term efficacy of stimulation in treating disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, has encouraged its application to a wide range of neurological and psychiatric conditions. Nevertheless, adoption of DBS remains limited, even in Parkinson's disease. Recent failed clinical trials of DBS in major depression, and modest treatment outcomes in dementia and epilepsy, are spurring further development. These improvements focus on interaction with disease circuits through complementary, spatially and temporally specific approaches. Spatial specificity is promoted by the use of segmented electrodes and field steering, and temporal specificity involves the delivery of patterned stimulation, mostly controlled through disease-related feedback. Underpinning these developments are new insights into brain structure-function relationships and aberrant circuit dynamics, including new methods with which to assess and refine the clinical effects of stimulation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDeep Brain StimulationHumansMovement DisordersBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31477926
PMCPMC6877347
OpenAlexW2964618399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.