ArticleJournal of human hypertension2020
The comparison of percent body fat estimated by different anthropometrics to predict the incidence of hypertension.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Percent body fat (%BF) is associated with the development of hypertension. However, the power of %BF estimated by different anthropometrics to predict incident hypertension was unknown. This study was from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). %BF was calculated using the equations with BMI, WC, and skinfold thickness and divided into low and high %BF according to ROC. Cox regression was employed to evaluate the power of different %BFs to predict the development of hypertension. When not adjusting for covariates, %BFs defined by BMI, WC, and ST were the significant predictors of the development of hypertension (all P < 0.0001; crude HR: 2.238, 3.243, and 1.574; and HR 95% CI: 2.098-2.387, 2.905-3.619, and 1.464-1.692). When three %BFs entered into model simultaneously, the significance in %BF estimated by ST disappeared (P = 0.0765; adjusted HR: 1.124; and HR 95% CI: 0.988-1.280). For males, %BFs by BMI, WC, and ST significantly affected the incidence of hypertension as they were separately analyzed (all P < 0.0001; crude HR: 2.445, 2.335, and 1.828; and HR 95% CI: 2.220-2.693, 2.011-2.712, and 1.636-2.042, respectively). For females, %BFs estimated by BMI, WC, and ST were the determinants of the development of hypertension whether covariates were adjusted or not (all P < 0.0001). In conclusion, there was a poor and ineffective association of %BF estimated by triceps skinfold thickness with the development of hypertension, especially when three %BFs were analyzed together. High %BFs estimated by BMI and WC were the true and effective predictors of the incidence of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31477822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.