Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477813›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia with TP53 gene alterations: a detailed clinicopathologic analysis.

Yen-Chun Liu, Elizabeth Margolskee, John N Allan, Susan Mathew, Erica Bhavsar, Joseph Casano, Attilio Orazi, Richard R Furman, Julia T Geyer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Prognostic value of prolymphocyte percentage in chronic lymphocytic leukemia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yen-Chun LiuDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Elizabeth MargolskeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8597-0636
John N AllanDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Susan MathewDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Erica BhavsarDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph CasanoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Attilio OraziDepartment of Pathology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Richard R FurmanDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Julia T GeyerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Jut9021@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USTexas Tech University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TP53 alteration in chronic lymphocytic leukemia indicates a high-risk disease that is usually refractory to chemotherapy. It may be caused by deletion of 17p involving the loss of TP53 gene, which occurs in low percentage of patients at diagnosis but can be acquired as the disease progresses. Since patients may harbor TP53 mutation without chromosome 17p deletion, consensus recommendations call for both cytogenetic and PCR mutation analysis of TP53 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We conducted a single-institution retrospective study to investigate the clinicopathologic features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with TP53 alterations as well as the utility of different diagnostic modalities to identify p53 alterations. Forty percent of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with TP53 alterations demonstrated atypical lymphocytes with cleaved/irregularly shaped nuclei and/or large atypical lymphoid cells with abundant cytoplasm in the peripheral blood. Progression was also observed in lymph node and bone marrow samples (21% with Richter transformation; 33% with findings suggestive of "accelerated phase" of chronic lymphocytic leukemia including prominent proliferation centers and/or increased numbers of prolymphocytes). However, the presence of the morphologic features suggestive of "accelerated phase" had no effect on overall survival within the chronic lymphocytic leukemia group with TP53 abnormalities (p > 0.05). As previously reported by others, a subset of patients with TP53 alterations were only identified by either PCR mutation analysis (12%) or cytogenetic studies (14%). p53 immunostain positivity was only identified in approximately half of the patients with TP53 alterations identified by either method, and it failed to identify any additional patients with p53 abnormalities. In summary, chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with TP53 alterations frequently show atypical morphologic features. Use of multiple modalities to identify p53 abnormalities is recommended to ensure optimal sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorChromosomes, Human, Pair 17DNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeBiomarkers, TumorTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID31477813
OpenAlexW2971881118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.