Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477727›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Assisted reproductive technologies are associated with limited epigenetic variation at birth that largely resolves by adulthood.

Boris Novakovic, Sharon Lewis, Jane Halliday, Joanne Kennedy, David P Burgner, Anna Czajko, Bowon Kim, Alexandra Sexton-Oates, Markus Juonala, Karin Hammarberg and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
25.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NADCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Boris NovakovicMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Sharon LewisMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Jane HallidayMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Joanne KennedyMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
David P BurgnerMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-4302
Anna CzajkoMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Bowon KimMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Alexandra Sexton-OatesMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Markus JuonalaMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-364X
Karin HammarbergGlobal Public Health, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5988-5865
David J AmorMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Lex W DoyleMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-7312
Sarath RanganathanMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Liam WelshMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Michael CheungMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
John McBainReproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Robert McLachlanHudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Richard SafferyMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. richard.saffery@mcri.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9510-4181
Royal Children's Hospital · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUThe University of Melbourne · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity of Turku · FIVictorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 7 million individuals have been conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and there is clear evidence that ART is associated with a range of adverse early life outcomes, including rare imprinting disorders. The periconception period and early embryogenesis are associated with widespread epigenetic remodeling, which can be influenced by ART, with effects on the developmental trajectory in utero, and potentially on health throughout life. Here we profile genome-wide DNA methylation in blood collected in the newborn period and in adulthood (age 22-35 years) from a unique longitudinal cohort of ART-conceived individuals, previously shown to have no differences in health outcomes in early adulthood compared with non-ART-conceived individuals. We show evidence for specific ART-associated variation in methylation around birth, most of which occurred independently of embryo culturing. Importantly, ART-associated epigenetic variation at birth largely resolves by adulthood with no direct evidence that it impacts on development and health.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultCohort StudiesEpigenomicsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomic ImprintingHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31477727
PMCPMC6718382
OpenAlexW2972146205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.