ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2019
Eye Movements and Comprehension Are Important to Reading.
Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthographic processing was facilitated by phonologically but not semantically similar distractors: evidence from the visual structure judgment of Mandarin Chinese characters using the Flanker paradigm.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- Do Love You Me? Failure to Notice Word Transpositions is Induced by Parallel Word Processing.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- An Application of Eye Movement Parameters Collected from Mass Market Devices for the Estimation of a Text Comprehension.Journal of eye movement research · 2023Article
- The impact of hyperlinks, skim reading and perceived importance when reading on the Web.PloS one · 2022Article
- Individuals with dyslexia use a different visual sampling strategy to read text.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Orthographic and phonological contributions to flanker effects.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- Parafoveal-on-foveal repetition effects in sentence reading: A co-registered eye-tracking and electroencephalogram study.Psychophysiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31477388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.