Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477387›Full record

ArticleTrends in cognitive sciences2019

You Can't Recognize Two Words Simultaneously.

Alex L White, Geoffrey M Boynton, Jason D Yeatman

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Negative effects of redundant targets.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2026
    Article
  4. On the spatial limits of parallel word processing in reading.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  5. Fast Feature- and Category-Related Parafoveal Previewing Support Free Visual Exploration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Attention extends beyond single words in beginning readers.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
  15. Orthographic and phonological contributions to flanker effects.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex L WhiteInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: alexlw@uw.edu.
Geoffrey M BoyntonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Jason D YeatmanInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

Capacity limits in the neural circuitry of visual word recognitionK99EY029366 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WHITE, ALEXANDER LINDLEY · 2018 to 2019
$233k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY029366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AttentionReadingattentionparallel processingreadingserial processingword recognition

Identifiers

PMID31477387
PMCPMC8906166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.