ArticleGynecologic oncology2019
Identification and validation of a prognostic proteomic signature for cervical cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advancement in inflammatory biomarkers for cervical cancer diagnosis and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Transcriptomics, Proteomics, and Machine Learning in HPV Infection and Cardiovascular Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Unveiling diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cervical cancer: biomarker discovery through proteomics approaches and exploring the role of cervical cancer stem cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Discovery of pathway-independent protein signatures associated with clinical outcome in human cancer cohorts.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Contribution of Multiplex Immunoassays to Rheumatoid Arthritis Management: From Biomarker Discovery to Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- Proteomic and ultrastructural analysis of Clara cell and type II alveolar epithelial cell-type lung cancer cells.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Identification of a transcriptomic signature with excellent survival prediction for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.American journal of cancer research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo date, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has provided the most extensive molecular characterization of invasive cervical cancer (ICC). Analysis of reverse phase protein array (RPPA) data from TCGA samples showed that cervical cancers could be stratified into 3 clusters exhibiting significant differences in survival outcome: hormone, EMT, and PI3K/AKT. The goals of the current study were to: 1) validate the TCGA RPPA results in an independent cohort of ICC patients and 2) to develop and validate an algorithm encompassing a small antibody set for clinical utility.
methodsSubjects consisted of 2 ICC patient cohorts with accompanying RPPA and clinical-pathologic data: 155 samples from TCGA (TCGA-155) and 61 additional, unique samples (MCW-61). Using data from 173 common RPPA antibodies, we replicated Silhouette clustering analysis in both ICC cohorts. Further, an index score for each patient was calculated from the survival-associated antibodies (SAAs) identified using Random survival forests (RSF) and the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed to assess and compare cluster or risk group survival outcome.
resultsIn addition to validating the prognostic ability of the proteomic clusters reported by TCGA, we developed an algorithm based on 22 unique antibodies (SAAs) that stratified women with ICC into low-, medium-, or high-risk survival groups.
conclusionsWe provide a signature of 22 antibodies which accurately predicted survival outcome in 2 separate groups of ICC patients. Future studies examining these candidate biomarkers in additional ICC cohorts is warranted to fully determine their clinical potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.