Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2019
A randomized, controlled phase II trial of neoadjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine, lapatinib, and nab-paclitaxel versus trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and paclitaxel in HER2-positive breast cancer (TEAL study).
Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02073487 (Randomized Open Label PhII Trial of Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Open Label PhII Trial of Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine(Te) in Combination w/Lapatinib(L) Followed by Abraxane (A) Compared w/Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab Followed by Paclitaxel in Her2/Neu Over-Expressed Breast Cancer Patients
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab compared to trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison between nab-paclitaxel and solvent-based taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Comparing Biomarkers for Predicting Pathological Responses to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Is nab-paclitaxel better than conventional taxanes as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? A meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Pooled it
- Treatment-Related Toxicities of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: Progress and future directions.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Review
- Drug resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Overcoming resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: from mechanistic insights to cutting-edge strategies.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: mechanisms of resistance and future therapeutic perspectives.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: current evidence and future directions.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Navigating heme pathways: the breach of heme oxygenase and hemin in breast cancer.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: A review.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- The optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategy for HR+/HER2 + breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Escalation and optimisation of primary breast cancer treatment with antibody-drug conjugates.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: current resistance mechanisms and future combination strategies.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
- The next frontier in antibody-drug conjugates: challenges and opportunities in cancer and autoimmune therapy.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates for breast cancer: a bibliometric study and clinical trial analysis.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Cost-utility and budget impact analysis of neoadjuvant dual HER2 targeted therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer in Sri Lanka.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exploring the Combined Action of Adding Pertuzumab to Branded Trastuzumab versus Trastuzumab Biosimilars for Treating HER2+ Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant dual human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab plus paclitaxel leads to an overall pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 46%. Dual HER2 blockade with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and lapatinib plus nab-paclitaxel has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. To test neoadjuvant effectiveness of this regimen, an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase II trial was conducted comparing T-DM1, lapatinib, and nab-paclitaxel with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and paclitaxel in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.
methodsStratification by estrogen receptor (ER) status occurred prior to randomization. Patients in the experimental arm received 6 weeks of targeted therapies (T-DM1 and lapatinib) followed by T-DM1 every 3 weeks, lapatinib daily, and nab-paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks. In the standard arm, patients received 6 weeks of trastuzumab and pertuzumab followed by trastuzumab weekly, pertuzumab every 3 weeks, and paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients with residual cancer burden (RCB) 0 or I. Key secondary objectives included pCR rate, safety, and change in tumor size at 6 weeks. Hypothesis-generating correlative assessments were also performed.
resultsThe 30 evaluable patients were well-balanced in patient and tumor characteristics. The proportion of patients with RCB 0 or I was higher in the experimental arm (100% vs. 62.5% in the standard arm, p = 0.0035). In the ER-positive subset, all patients in the experimental arm achieved RCB 0-I versus 25% in the standard arm (p = 0.0035). Adverse events were similar between the two arms.
conclusionIn early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, the neoadjuvant treatment with T-DM1, lapatinib, and nab-paclitaxel was more effective than the standard treatment, particularly in the ER-positive cohort.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02073487 , February 27, 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.