Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477140›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2019

Implementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol.

Peter Scalia, Marie-Anne Durand, Rachel C Forcino, Danielle Schubbe, Paul J Barr, Nancy O'Brien, A James O'Malley, Tina Foster, Mary C Politi, Shannon Laughlin-Tommaso and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03985449 (Implementation of Uterine Fibroid Option Grid Patient Decision Aids Across Five Organizational Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03985449 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of Uterine Fibroid Option Grid Patient Decision Aids Across Five Organizational Settings: a Randomized Stepped-wedge Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2019 to 2023Enrolled748ConditionsUterine FibroidArmsUterine Fibroid Option Grid encounter patient decision aid (text only), Uterine Fibroid Option Grid encounter patient decision aid (text + Pictures), Uterine Fibroid Option Grid encounter patient decision aid (online)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Processes for evidence summarization for patient decision aids: A Delphi consensus study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Peter ScaliaThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Marie-Anne DurandThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Rachel C ForcinoThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Danielle SchubbeThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Paul J BarrThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Nancy O'BrienThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
A James O'MalleyThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Tina FosterThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Mary C PolitiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Shannon Laughlin-TommasoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Erika BanksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Tessa MaddenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Raymond M AnchanDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Johanna W M AartsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Priscilla VelentgasAetion, Boston, MA, USA.
Joyce Balls-BerryCollege of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Carla BaconNational Uterine Fibroids Foundation, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Monica Adams-FosterThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Carrie Cahill MulliganThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Sateria VenableThe Fibroid Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nancy E CochranThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Glyn ElwynThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. glynelwyn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-6286

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUterine fibroids are non-cancerous overgrowths of the smooth muscle in the uterus. As they grow, some cause problems such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, discomfort during sexual intercourse, and rarely pregnancy complications or difficulty becoming pregnant. Multiple treatment options are available. The lack of comparative evidence demonstrating superiority of any one treatment means that choosing the best option is sensitive to individual preferences. Women with fibroids wish to consider treatment trade-offs. Tools known as patient decision aids (PDAs) are effective in increasing patient engagement in the decision-making process. However, the implementation of PDAs in routine care remains challenging. Our aim is to use a multi-component implementation strategy to implement the uterine fibroids Option Grid™ PDAs at five organizational settings in the USA.

methodsWe will conduct a randomized stepped-wedge implementation study where five sites will be randomized to implement the uterine fibroid Option Grid PDA in practice at different time points. Implementation will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalization Process Theory (NPT). There will be a 6-month pre-implementation phase, a 2-month initiation phase where participating clinicians will receive training and be introduced to the Option Grid PDAs (available in text, picture, or online formats), and a 6-month active implementation phase where clinicians will be expected to use the PDAs with patients who are assigned female sex at birth, are at least 18 years of age, speak fluent English or Spanish, and have new or recurrent symptoms of uterine fibroids. We will exclude postmenopausal patients. Our primary outcome measure is the number of eligible patients who receive the Option Grid PDAs. We will use logistic and linear regression analyses to compare binary and continuous quantitative outcome measures (including survey scores and Option Grid use) between the pre- and active implementation phases while adjusting for patient and clinician characteristics. DISCUSSION: This study may help identify the factors that impact the implementation and sustained use of a PDA in clinic workflow from various stakeholder perspectives while helping patients with uterine fibroids make treatment decisions that align with their preferences.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov , NCT03985449. Registered 13 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03985449.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPatient PreferenceAdolescentAdultCommunicationCultural CharacteristicsDecision MakingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLeiomyomaMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf EfficacyYoung AdultConsolidated Framework for Implementation ResearchCo-productionDecision support interventionElectronic health recordImplementationNormalization Process TheoryPatient decision aidsPicture superiorityShared decision makingUterine fibroids

Identifiers

PMID31477140
PMCPMC6721118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.