Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477107›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2019

Improving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): ERAS APPtimize study protocol, a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a patient-centred mobile application on patient participation in colorectal surgery.

A Rauwerdink, M Jansen, C A J M de Borgie, W A Bemelman, F Daams, M P Schijven, C J Buskens

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Enhanced recovery in children: how could we go further?World journal of pediatric surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A RauwerdinkDepartment of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-3156
M JansenDepartment of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C A J M de BorgieClinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
W A BemelmanDepartment of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
F DaamsDepartment of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M P SchijvenDepartment of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C J BuskensDepartment of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands. c.j.buskens@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

Academisch Medisch Centrum Innovation subsidy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative care in colorectal surgery is systematically defined in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. The ERAS protocol improves perioperative care in a multimodal way to enhance early and safe release from the hospital. Adequate compliance to the elements of the ERAS protocol is multifactorial. There are still opportunities to improve compliance of the protocol by actively involving the patient. The main objective of this study is to investigate whether compliance of selected items in the ERAS protocol can be improved through actively involving patients in the ERAS care pathway through the use of a patient-centred mobile application.

methodsA multicentre randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, who are 18 years or older and in possession of an eligible smartphone, will be included. Patients assigned to the intervention group will install a patient-centred mobile application to be guided through the ERAS care pathway. Patients in the control group will receive care as usual. Both groups will wear an activity tracker. The primary outcome is overall compliance to selected active elements of the ERAS protocol, as registered by the patient. Secondary outcomes include Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) such as health-related quality of life, physical activity, and patient satisfaction of received care. Care-related outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, number of complications, re-intervention, and readmission rates, will also be assessed.

resultsThe enrolment of patients will start in the second quarter of 2019. Data collection had not begun by the time this protocol was submitted.

conclusionWe hypothesize that by providing patients with a patient-centred mobile application, compliance to the active elements of ERAS protocol can be improved, resulting in an increased health-related quality of life, physical activity, and patient satisfaction.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register, NTR7314 , prospectively registered on the 9th of November 2017 ( http://www.trialregister.nl ).

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryMobile ApplicationsPatient ParticipationElective Surgical ProceduresHumansLength of StayMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient CompliancePerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionColorectal surgeryeHealthERASmHealthMobile application

Identifiers

PMID31477107
PMCPMC6719362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.