Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477075›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials.

Ewelina Rogozińska, Javier Zamora, Nadine Marlin, Ana Pilar Betrán, Arne Astrup, Annick Bogaerts, Jose G Cecatti, Jodie M Dodd, Fabio Facchinetti, Nina R W Geiker and 18 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Ewelina RogozińskaMeta-Analysis Group, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK. e.rogozinska@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-0644
Javier ZamoraWomen's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Nadine MarlinPragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ana Pilar BetránDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Arne AstrupDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Allé 51, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annick BogaertsDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Box 805, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Jose G CecattiRua Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, São Paulo, Campinas, CEP, 13083-887, Brazil.
Jodie M DoddWomen's and Children's Hospital, Women's and Children's Health Network, Women's and Babies Division, 72 King William St, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
Fabio FacchinettiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mother Infant Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, largo del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
Nina R W GeikerClinical Nutrition Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Kildegårdsvej 28, DK-2900 Hellerup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene A H HaakstadDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Sognsveien 220, 0863, Oslo, Norway.
Hans HaunerElse Kröner-Fresenius-Zentrum für Ernährungsmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Dorte M JensenSteno Diabetes Center Odense and Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 6/4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Tarja I KinnunenUnit of Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland.
Ben W J MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
Julie OwensThe Robinson Research Institute, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Norwich Centre, 55 King William St, North Adelaide, SA, 5006, Australia.
Suzanne PhelanKinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.
Kristina M RenaultDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Kjell Å SalvesenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Children's and Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Olav Kyrres gate 11, 7006, Trondheim, Norway.
Alexis ShubDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Fernanda G SuritaRua Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126 Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, São Paulo, Campinas, CEP, 13083-887, Brazil.
Signe N StafneDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Helena TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health, Monash University and Monash Health, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3124, Australia.
Mireille N M van PoppelInstitute of Sports Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14,, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Christina A VinterDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 29, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark.
Khalid S KhanWomen's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Shakila ThangaratinamWomen's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group

Funding

Department of Health 12/01/50Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10452Health Technology Assessment Programme 12/01/50World Health Organization 001World Health Organization not available
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh Body Mass Index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect an increasing number of pregnancies. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has issued recommendations on the optimal GWG for women according to their pre-pregnancy BMI (healthy, overweight or obese). It has been shown that pregnant women rarely met the recommendations; however, it is unclear by how much. Previous studies also adjusted the analyses for various women's characteristics making their comparison challenging.

methodsWe analysed individual participant data (IPD) of healthy women with a singleton pregnancy and a BMI of 18.5 kg/m

resultsOut of 4429 women (from 33 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria, two thirds gained weight outside the IOM recommendations (1646 above; 1291 below). The median GWG outside the IOM recommendations was 3.1 kg above and 2.7 kg below. In comparison to GWG within the IOM recommendations, GWG above was associated with increased odds of caesarean section (aOR 1.50; 95%CI 1.25, 1.80), LGA (2.00; 1.58, 2.54), and reduced odds of SGA (0.66; 0.50, 0.87); no significant effect on preterm birth was detected. The relationship between GWG below the IOM recommendation and caesarean section or LGA was inconclusive; however, the odds of preterm birth (1.94; 1.31, 2.28) and SGA (1.52; 1.18, 1.96) were increased.

conclusionsConsistently with previous findings, adherence to the IOM recommendations seem to help achieve better pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, even in the context of clinical trials, women find it difficult to adhere to them. Further research should focus on identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG as defined by the IOM recommendations.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainCesarean SectionFemaleFetal Growth RetardationFetal MacrosomiaGuidelines as TopicHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy in ObesityPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBody mass indexGestational weight gainIndividual participant dataInstitute of Medicine

Identifiers

PMID31477075
PMCPMC6719382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.