Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477071›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: Findings from the International Food Policy Study.

Janelle Kwon, Adrian J Cameron, David Hammond, Christine M White, Lana Vanderlee, Jasmin Bhawra, Gary Sacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janelle KwonGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Adrian J CameronGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
David HammondSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Christine M WhiteSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Lana VanderleeSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Jasmin BhawraSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Gary SacksGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. gary.sacks@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9736-1539

Funding

CIHR Population Health Intervention Research Operating Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor diet is a significant contributor to the burden of global disease. There are numerous policies available to address poor diets; however, these policies often require public support to encourage policy action. The current study aimed to understand the level of public support for a range of food policies and the factors associated with policy support.

methodsAn online survey measuring support for 13 food policies was completed by 19,857 adults in Australia, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). The proportion of respondents that supported each policy was compared between countries, and the association between demographic characteristics and policy support was analysed using multivariate logistic regression.

resultsThe level of support varied between policies, with the highest support for policies that provided incentives (e.g., price subsidies) or information (e.g., calorie labelling on menus), and the lowest support for those that imposed restrictions (e.g., restrictions on sponsorship of sport events). This pattern of support was similar in all countries, but the level differed, with Mexico generally recording the highest support across policies, and the US the lowest. Several demographic characteristics were associated with policy support; however, these relationships varied between countries.

conclusionThe results suggest that support for food policies is influenced by several factors related to the policy design, country, and individual demographic characteristics. Policymakers and advocates should consider these factors when developing and promoting policy options.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyNutrition PolicyPublic OpinionAdultAustraliaCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMexicoSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomUnited StatesGlobal healthHealthy dietPublic opinionPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID31477071
PMCPMC6721115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.