Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477063›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Sexual practices, sexual behavior and HIV risk profile of key populations in Nigeria.

Bartholomew Ochonye, Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan, Adesegun O Fatusi, Bamidele M Bello, Babatunde Ajidagba, Godwin Emmanuel, Paul Umoh, Ayo Yusuf, T Jaiyebo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bartholomew OchonyeHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Morenike Oluwatoyin FolayanNew HIV Vaccine and Microbicide Advocacy Society, Lagos, Nigeria. toyinukpong@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9008-7730
Adesegun O FatusiCollege Research and Partnership Advancement (CoRPA) Office, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Bamidele M BelloPopulation and Reproductive Health Programme, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Babatunde AjidagbaAcademy for Health Development (AHEAD), Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Godwin EmmanuelHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Paul UmohHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ayo YusufHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
T JaiyeboHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.

Funding

Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria through the Society for Family Health. NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little evidence on the need for differentiated HIV prevention services for men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW) and people who inject drugs (PWID in Nigeria. The aim of the study was to determine and compare the HIV sexual risk profiles of FSW, MSM and PWID resident in Nigeria; and identify factors associated with condom use among the groups. This will help identify if differentiated HIV prevention services are needed for MSM, FSW and PWID in Nigeria.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study. Data on sexual practices (anal, vaginal and oral sex), history of alcohol and psychoactive substance use, and high risk sexual behaviors for HIV infection (inconsistent use of condom) was collected from study FSW, MSM and PWID resident in Enugu, Nassarawa, Benue, and Akwa-Ibom States of Nigeria between April and June, 2015. Association between sexual practices, alcohol and psychoactive substance use, and HIV sexual risk behaviors; and differences in sexual risk behaviors of MSM, FSW and PWID were determined using Pearson chi-square for categorical variables, and t-test for continuous variables. Determinants of condom use in the last 30 days were identified using logistic regression analysis.

resultsThe study population consisted of 188 (38.5%) FSW, 145 (29.7%) MSM and 155 (31.8%) PWID. MSM (AOR: 0.17; 95%CI: 0.05-0.67; p = 0.01) and PWID (AOR: 0.07; 95%CI: 0.02-0.21; p < 0.001) were significantly less likely than FSW to have used condom in the last 30 days. A lower proportion of FSW and PWID used condom during anal sex in the last 12 months when compared with MSM (p < 0.001 respectively). The proportion of MSM (23.5%) and FSW (23.4%) who had ever used psychoactive drugs was high. Of those who had ever used psychoactive drugs, 25.0% of FSW and 29.4% of MSM had injected drugs in the last 30 days of the survey. Also, 39.3% of PWID shared needles and syringes. The use of psychoactive substances (AOR: 5.01; 95%CI: 2.59-9.68; p < 0.001) and the ability to negotiate condom use (AOR: 2.04; 95%CI: 1.06-3.93; p = 0.03) were factors associated with condom use in the last 30 days of the survey.

conclusionHIV prevention programs designed for MSM, FSW and PWID need to address inconsistent condom use during sex by addressing condom negotation skills. This sexual risk behavior is common to the three groups.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UsersFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNigeriaSexual BehaviorSex WorkersSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFemale sex workersKey populationsMen who have sex with menNigeriaPeople who inject drugsSexual behaviorSexual practices

Identifiers

PMID31477063
PMCPMC6721228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.