Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31477039›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2019

Patient-reported outcome measures: selection of a valid questionnaire for routine symptom assessment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease - a four-phase mixed methods study.

Esmee M van der Willik, Yvette Meuleman, Karen Prantl, Giel van Rijn, Willem Jan W Bos, Frans J van Ittersum, Hans A J Bart, Marc H Hemmelder, Friedo W Dekker

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04841785 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The RECOVAC LESS CoV-2 Study - Long Term Efficacy and Safety of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Stage G4-G5, on Dialysis or After Kidney Transplantation

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2021 to 2023Enrolled4,868ConditionsCovid19, SARS-CoV Infection, Chronic Kidney DiseasesArmsmailer-based finger-prick
NCT07552961 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Feasibility of a Comprehensive Prehabilitation Program for Use in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow ObstructionArmsComprehensive Prehabilitation Programming
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Healthcare consumer acceptability of routine use of the EQ-5D-5L in clinical care: a cross-sectional survey.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  13. Health-related quality of life and symptom burden in patients on haemodialysis.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Age and gender differences in symptom experience and health-related quality of life in kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Article
  17. Validity and reliability of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) using computerized adaptive testing in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Esmee M van der WillikDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. E.M.van_der_Willik@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-5857
Yvette MeulemanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karen PrantlDutch Kidney Patients Association, Groot Hertoginnelaan 34, 1405 EE, Bussum, The Netherlands.
Giel van RijnDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Willem Jan W BosDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frans J van IttersumDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans A J BartDutch Kidney Patients Association, Groot Hertoginnelaan 34, 1405 EE, Bussum, The Netherlands.
Marc H HemmelderNefrovisie Foundation, Moreelsepark 1, 3511 EP, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Friedo W DekkerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming increasingly important in healthcare. In nephrology, there is no agreement on which chronic kidney disease (CKD) symptom questionnaire to use. Therefore, the aim of this study is to select a valid symptom questionnaire for routine assessment in patients with advanced CKD.

methodsA four-phase mixed methods approach, using qualitative and quantitative research methods, was applied. First, a systematic literature search was conducted to retrieve existing symptom questionnaires. Second, a symptom list was created including all symptoms in existing questionnaires and symptoms mentioned in interviews with patients with CKD, from which symptom clusters were identified. Next, questionnaires were selected based on predefined criteria regarding content validity. Last, two online feedback panels of patients with CKD (n = 151) and experts (n = 6) reviewed the most promising questionnaires.

resultsThe literature search identified 121 questionnaires, of which 28 were potentially suitable for symptom assessment in patients with advanced CKD. 101 unique symptoms and 10 symptom clusters were distinguished. Based on predefined criteria, the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) and Palliative Care Outcome Scale-Renal Version (IPOS-Renal) were selected and reviewed by feedback panels. Patients needed 5.4 and 7.5 min to complete the DSI and IPOS-Renal, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients experienced the DSI as more specific, complete and straightforward compared to the IPOS-Renal.

conclusionsThe DSI was found to be valid and reliable, the most relevant, complete, and comprehensible symptom questionnaire available for routine assessment in patients with advanced CKD. Routine PROMs collection could be of great value to healthcare, both at individual patient and national level. Feedback on scores and involvement of healthcare providers may promote adaptation and implementation in healthcare.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRegistriesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultChronic kidney disease (CKD)DialysisEnd-stage kidney disease (ESKD)Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)Pre-dialysisQuestionnaireSymptom burdenValue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID31477039
PMCPMC6720373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.