SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019
Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Role and efficacy of capecitabine in the anthracycline-free regimen in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Is There a Place for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacologic de-escalation of dexamethasone during weekly paclitaxel: a randomized phase III trial evaluating safety, endocrine effects, and quality of life.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Pertuzumab Versus Taxane Plus Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab After Anthracycline for High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: The Phase III KAITLIN Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Trial
- Acute and chronic effects of physical exercise on pain in breast cancer survivors during chemotherapy: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy and Breast Reconstruction: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanism-based management of taxane-induced neuropathic pain in breast cancer survivors: a critical review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Meta-Analysis and Experimental Studies Reveal Mitotic Network Activity Index (MNAI) as Breast Cancer Metastasis and Treatment Biomarker.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predicting the Efficacy of Eribulin in Metastatic Breast Cancer by Assessing E-Cadherin and Vimentin Expression.Acta histochemica et cytochemica · 2025Article
- Docetaxel Resistance in Breast Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Ocular adverse events of perioperative adjuvant docetaxel vs paclitaxel for breast cancer: propensity-score overlap-weighted analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Dexamethasone dose-dependently attenuates docetaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- 15-Year Survival Outcome of Primary Breast Conservation Therapy in Young Women with Breast Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- HER2 positive primary breast squamous cell carcinoma with good prognosis: a case report.AME case reports · 2025Article
- Atrial fibrillation in cancer, anticancer therapies, and underlying mechanisms.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2024Review
- Breast cancer treatment and its impact on survival in Morocco: a study over a decade.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Breast Cancer Immunotherapy: A Clinical Review for the Plastic Surgeon.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Quantifying Chemotherapy Delivery in Older and Younger Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Using Longitudinal Cumulative Dose.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Research advances of MAL family members in tumorigenesis and tumor progression (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Taxane Treatment in Breast Cancer: Clinical Perspectives and Toxicity Profiles.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Taxanes are highly active chemotherapy agents used in metastatic breast cancer. Review authors examined their role in early breast cancer. This review is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2007.
objectivesTo assess the effects of taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for treatment of women with operable early breast cancer. SEARCH
methodsFor this review update, we searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (2018, Issue 6), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov on 16 July 2018, using key words such as 'early breast cancer' and 'taxanes'. We screened reference lists of other related literature reviews and articles, contacted trial authors, and applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing taxane-containing regimens versus non-taxane-containing regimens in women with operable breast cancer were included. Studies of women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary outcome measure. Toxicity was represented as odds ratios (ORs), and quality of life (QoL) data were extracted when present. MAIN
resultsThis review included 29 studies (27 full-text publications and 2 abstracts or online theses). The updated analysis included 41,911 randomised women; the original review included 21,191 women. Taxane-containing regimens improved OS (HR 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.92; high-certainty evidence; 27 studies; 39,180 women; 6501 deaths) and DFS (HR, 0.88, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92; high-certainty evidence; 29 studies; 41,909 women; 10,271 reported events) compared to chemotherapy without a taxane. There was moderate to substantial heterogeneity across studies for OS and DFS (respectively).When a taxane-containing regimen was compared with the same regimen without a taxane, the beneficial effects of taxanes persisted for OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.92; P < 0.001; 7 studies; 10,842 women) and for DFS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.90; P < 0.001; 7 studies; 10,842 women). When a taxane-containing regimen was compared with the same regimen with another drug or drugs that were substituted for the taxane, a beneficial effect was observed for OS and DFS with the taxane-containing regimen (OS: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.86; P < 0.001; 13 studies; 16,196 women; DFS: HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88; P < 0.001; 14 studies; 16,823 women). Preliminary subgroup analysis by lymph node status showed a survival benefit with taxane-containing regimens in studies of women with lymph node-positive disease only (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88; P < 0.001; 17 studies; 22,055 women) but less benefit in studies of women both with and without lymph node metastases or with no lymph node metastases. Taxane-containing regimens also improved DFS in women with lymph node-positive disease (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.88; P < 0.001; 17 studies; 22,055 women), although the benefit was marginal in studies of women both with and without lymph node-positive disease (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02; 9 studies; 12,998 women) and was not apparent in studies of women with lymph node-negative disease (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.14; 3 studies; 6856 women).Taxanes probably result in a small increase in risk of febrile neutropenia (odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.49; moderate-certainty evidence; 24 studies; 33,763 women) and likely lead to a large increase in grade 3/4 neuropathy (OR 6.89, 95% CI 3.23 to 14.71; P < 0.001; moderate-certainty evidence; 22 studies; 31,033 women). Taxanes probably cause little or no difference in cardiotoxicity compared to regimens without a taxane (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.33; moderate-certainty evidence; 23 studies; 32,894 women). Seven studies reported low-quality evidence for QoL; overall, taxanes may make little or no difference in QoL compared to chemotherapy without a taxane during the follow-up period; however, the duration of follow-up differed across studies. Only one study, which was conducted in Europe, provided cost-effectiveness data. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review of studies supports the use of taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, with improvement in overall survival and disease-free survival for women with operable early breast cancer. This benefit persisted when analyses strictly compared a taxane-containing regimen versus the same regimen without a taxane or the same regimen with another drug that was substituted for the taxane. Preliminary evidence suggests that taxanes are more effective for women with lymph node-positive disease than for those with lymph node-negative disease. Considerable heterogeneity across studies probably reflects the varying efficacy of the chemotherapy backbones of the comparator regimens used in these studies. This review update reports results that are remarkably consistent with those of the original review, and it is highly unlikely that this review will be updated, as new trials are assessing treatments based on more detailed breast cancer biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.