Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31475624›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Role of Sex in Determining Treatment Type for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Lower Extremity Revascularization.

Niveditta Ramkumar, Bjoern D Suckow, Jeremiah R Brown, Art Sedrakyan, Todd MacKenzie, David H Stone, Jack L Cronenwett, Philip P Goodney

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niveditta RamkumarThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Lebanon NH.
Bjoern D SuckowSection of Vascular Surgery Department of Surgery Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon NH.
Jeremiah R BrownThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Lebanon NH.
Art SedrakyanWeill Cornell Medical College Cornell University New York NY.
Todd MacKenzieThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Lebanon NH.
David H StoneSection of Vascular Surgery Department of Surgery Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon NH.
Jack L CronenwettSection of Vascular Surgery Department of Surgery Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon NH.
Philip P GoodneyThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Lebanon NH.
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Limited data exist to describe factors that influence the use of different endovascular treatments for peripheral arterial disease. Therefore, we studied sex differences in the utilization of endovascular treatment modalities and their impact on arterial patency. Methods and Results We analyzed procedures from 2010 to 2016 in the Vascular Quality Initiative for arteries treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone, stenting (with/without PTA), and atherectomy (with/without PTA). We explored sex differences in treatment modality by arterial segment (iliac, femoropopliteal, and tibial) with multivariable logistic regression. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression to study sex differences in arterial reintervention and occlusion. In this cohort, patients (n=58 247, mean age 68 years, 41% women,) had 106 073 arteries treated (median=2 arteries, interquartile range=1-3). Half (50%) of these arteries were treated with stents, 39% with PTA alone, and 11% with atherectomy. After risk adjustment, women were less likely to undergo stenting or atherectomy (versus PTA alone) in the femoropopliteal (stent risk ratio=0.78 [0.74-0.82]; atherectomy risk ratio=0.69 [0.58-0.82]) and tibial arteries (stent risk ratio=0.70 [0.55-0.89]; atherectomy risk ratio=0.87 [0.70-1.07]). In the iliac arteries there was no sex difference in stenting, and atherectomy was rarely used (0.2%). Women underwent reintervention in the femoropopliteal arteries (hazard ratio=1.28 [1.17-1.40]) or developed an occlusion in the iliac (hazard ratio=1.42 [1.12-1.81]) and femoropopliteal arteries (hazard ratio=1.19 [1.06-1.34]) more frequently than men. Conclusions Women were less likely to undergo stenting or atherectomy and had higher rates of occlusion and reintervention, especially in the femoropopliteal arteries. Evidence-based guidelines are needed to guide optimal use of endovascular treatments for men and women.

Indexed as

AngioplastyAtherectomyHealthcare DisparitiesAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseaseRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsStentsangioplastyatherectomypatencystenttreatment disparitieswomen

Identifiers

PMID31475624
PMCPMC6755836
OpenAlexW2970130340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.