Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31475316›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

Outcomes following colonic stenting for malignant left-sided bowel obstruction: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Patrick Anthony Boland, M E Kelly, N E Donlon, E Rausa, D P Beddy, P H McCormick, B J Mehigan, J O Larkin

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to SurgeryEmergency medicine international · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick Anthony BolandAcademic Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland. patrick.boland.1@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5844-7695
M E KellyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
N E DonlonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
E RausaSurgical Oncology Unit, Treviglio Hospital, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
D P BeddyAcademic Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
P H McCormickDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
B J MehiganDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
J O LarkinDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
St. James's Hospital · IEConnolly Hospital Blanchardstown · IEAzienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMalignant bowel obstruction is a common presentation and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Emergency resection is the traditional treatment modality. In recent years, colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery has become more prevalent. However, there is considerable debate surrounding its use. The aim of this review was to examine the technical and clinical success of self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery for obstructing colorectal tumours.

methodsWe systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials using PubMed, Cochrane and SCOPUS databases. Included studies must have compared outcomes in SEMS as a bridge to surgery with those proceeding straight to emergency resection.

resultsA total of 1245 studies were identified. After removal of duplicates and non-relevant studies, we identified seven articles which met the predefined criteria. This review observed that 81% of SEMS were technically successful, with 76% of patients having restoration of gastrointestinal function. Iatrogenic perforation rate was 5%. One-fifth of patients required emergency surgery following stent placement, and permanent stoma rate was 8.7%.

conclusionThis study observed that SEMS as a bridge to surgery is associated with good technical and clinical success, with low rates of perforation and permanent stoma. SEMS should be part of the treatment armamentarium for obstructing colorectal neoplasms, but careful patient selection and institutional expertise are important factors for success.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicStentsAgedFemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeColorectal neoplasmEmergency surgerySelf-expanding stentsSurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31475316
OpenAlexW2971346103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.