Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31475033›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Extensive Cryptic Diversity Within the

Juliana Nascimento, Jucivaldo D Lima, Pablo Suárez, Diego Baldo, Gilda V Andrade, Todd W Pierson, Benjamin M Fitzpatrick, Célio F B Haddad, Shirlei M Recco-Pimentel, Luciana Bolsoni Lourenço

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative cytogenetics of theComparative cytogenetics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juliana NascimentoLaboratório de Estudos Cromossômicos (LabEsC), Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jucivaldo D LimaNúcleo de Biodiversidade (NUBIO), Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Estado do Amapá, Zoologia, Campus da Fazendinha, Macapá, Brazil.
Pablo SuárezInstituto de Biología Subtropical (CONICET-UNaM), Puerto Iguazú, Argentina.
Diego BaldoLaboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Instituto de Biología Subtropical (CONICET-UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Argentina.
Gilda V AndradeDepartamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Maranhão-UFMA, São Luís, Brazil.
Todd W PiersonDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Benjamin M FitzpatrickDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Célio F B HaddadDepartamento de Zoologia and Centro de Aquicultura (CAUNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
Shirlei M Recco-PimentelLaboratório de Estudos Cromossômicos (LabEsC), Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana Bolsoni LourençoLaboratório de Estudos Cromossômicos (LabEsC), Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous cytogenetic and phylogenetic analyses showed a high variability in the frog taxa

Indexed as

AmazoniachromosomeDNA-based species delimitationPhysalaemusRADseq

Identifiers

PMID31475033
PMCPMC6702337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.