Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31474989›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Neutrophil Maturity in Cancer.

John B G Mackey, Seth B Coffelt, Leo M Carlin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Activated neutrophils: A next generation cellular immunotherapy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John B G MackeyInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Seth B CoffeltInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Leo M CarlinInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23983Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils are implicated in almost every stage of oncogenesis and paradoxically display anti- and pro-tumor properties. Accumulating evidence indicates that neutrophils display diversity in their phenotype resulting from functional plasticity and/or changes to granulopoiesis. In cancer, neutrophils at a range of maturation stages can be identified in the blood and tissues (i.e., outside of their developmental niche). The functional capacity of neutrophils at different states of maturation is poorly understood resulting from challenges in their isolation, identification, and investigation. Thus, the impact of neutrophil maturity on cancer progression and therapy remains enigmatic. In this review, we discuss the identification, prevalence, and function of immature and mature neutrophils in cancer and the potential impact of this on tumor progression and cancer therapy.

Indexed as

CCAAT-Binding FactorCell DifferentiationDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansLeukopoiesisNeoplasmsNeutrophilsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1Trans-ActivatorsCCAAT-Binding FactorProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1Trans-Activatorscancercancer inflammationgranulopoiesismyeloidneutrophil

Identifiers

PMID31474989
PMCPMC6702268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.