Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31474853›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2019

Levofloxacin: Insights Into Antibiotic Resistance and Product Quality.

Ensieh Izadi, Gull Afshan, Rahul P Patel, Venkatesan M Rao, Kai Bin Liew, Meor Mohd Redzuan Meor Mohd Affandi, Nurolaini Kifli, Amal Suleiman, Kah Seng Lee, Md Moklesur R Sarker and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparison ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Levofloxacin might be safe to use for OSCC patients.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021
    Article
  13. A systematic review of pharmaceutical price mark-up practice and its implementation.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Ensieh IzadiDivision of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Gull AfshanDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rahul P PatelDivision of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Venkatesan M RaoFaculty of Pharmacy, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Malaysia.
Kai Bin LiewFaculty of Pharmacy, Cyberjaya University College of Medical Sciences, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Meor Mohd Redzuan Meor Mohd AffandiFaculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Malaysia.
Nurolaini KifliPAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam.
Amal SuleimanCollege of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Kah Seng LeeFaculty of Pharmacy, Cyberjaya University College of Medical Sciences, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Md Moklesur R SarkerDepartment of Pharmacy, State University of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Syed Tabish ZaidiDivision of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Long Chiau MingDivision of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
University of Tasmania · AUUniversiti Brunei Darussalam · BNUniversity of Cyberjaya · MYLiaquat National Hospital · PKPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SASEGi University · MYState University of Bangladesh · BDUniversiti Teknologi MARA · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counterfeit and substandard medicines are recognized as one of serious threats to public health. The product quality of antibacterial medicine will compromise patients' recovery and increase the chance of antibacterial resistance. The review aims to provide a summary of low quality levofloxacin issues and the risk factors as well as suggesting the aspects of product quality that need to be regulated strictly. Quality of the active ingredient, levofloxacin, has an important role to contribute to successful therapy. The poor quality of raw material, directly and indirectly, causes treatment failure as the presence of insufficient dose, mislabeled content, and poor dissolution characteristics can lead to lower bioavailability. Identifying and reporting these factors can potentially help in improving the quality of drug marketed in various developing countries and may also reduce the incidences of treatment failure. Dissolution test is used for testing the dissolution profiles and the rate of drug release from solid formulation such as oral formulations, thus providing information regarding the in vivo performance of a formulation and its bioequivalence. On the other hand, quality-testing procedures are used for comparing the quality of products.

Indexed as

counterfeitfluroquinolone resistancepost marketing surveillancequality medicineregulatory requirement

Identifiers

PMID31474853
PMCPMC6702332
OpenAlexW2959105290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.