Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31474848›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2019

Effects of a Multi-Session Cognitive Training Combined With Brain Stimulation (TrainStim-Cog) on Age-Associated Cognitive Decline - Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Phase IIb (Monocenter) Trial.

Daria Antonenko, Friederike Thams, Jessica Uhrich, Annika Dix, Franka Thurm, Shu-Chen Li, Ulrike Grittner, Agnes Flöel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03838211 (tDCS-accompanied Cognitive Training Effects in Healthy Older Adults - Randomised, Sham Controlled, Interventional Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03838211 nacompletednot on this map

tDCS-accompanied Cognitive Training Effects in Healthy Older Adults - Randomised, Sham Controlled, Interventional Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medicine GreifswaldRan2018 to 2020Enrolled56ConditionsAgingArmsAnodal tDCS, Intensive cognitive training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daria AntonenkoDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Friederike ThamsDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Jessica UhrichDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Annika DixChair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Franka ThurmChair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Shu-Chen LiChair of Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrike GrittnerBerlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Agnes FlöelDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DETU Dresden · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increasing aging populations worldwide, developing interventions against age-associated cognitive decline is particularly important. Evidence suggests that combination of brain stimulation with cognitive training intervention may enhance training effects in terms of performance gain or transfer to untrained domains. This protocol describes a Phase IIb clinical trial that investigates the intervention effects of training combined with brain stimulation in older adults.

methodsThe TrainStim-Cog study is a monocentric, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled intervention. The study will investigate cognitive training with concurrent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (target intervention) compared to cognitive training with sham stimulation (control intervention) over nine sessions in 3 weeks, consisting of a letter updating task, and a three-stage Markov decision-making task. Fifty-six older adults will be recruited from the general population. Baseline assessment will be performed including neuropsychological screening and performance on training tasks. Participants will be allocated to one of the two study arms using block-wise randomization stratified by age and baseline performance with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Primary outcome is performance in the letter updating task after training under anodal tDCS compared to sham stimulation. Secondary outcomes include performance changes in the decision-making task and transfer tasks, as well as brain structure and functional networks assessed by structural, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that are acquired pre- and post-intervention. SIGNIFICANCE: The main aim of the TrainStim-Cog study is to provide evidence for behavioral and neuronal effects of tDCS-accompanied cognitive training and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms in older adults. Our findings will contribute toward developing efficient interventions for age-associated cognitive decline.

trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03838211 at February 12, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03838211. PROTOCOL VERSION: Based on BB 004/18 version 1.2 (May 17, 2019).

Indexed as

agingcognitive trainingdecision-makingspatial learningtranscranial direct current stimulationtransferworking memory

Identifiers

PMID31474848
PMCPMC6707337
OpenAlexW2959996710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.