Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31474825›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Reconciling Color Vision Models With Midget Ganglion Cell Receptive Fields.

Sara S Patterson, Maureen Neitz, Jay Neitz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. S-cone-specific circuitry in the outer plexiform layer of a cone-dominant mammal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cone-Opponent Ganglion Cells in the Primate Fovea Tuned to Noncardinal Color Directions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. From cones to color vision: a neurobiological model that explains the unique hues.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2023
    Article
  11. Gaining the system: limits to compensating color deficiencies through post-receptoral gain changes.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2023
    Article
  12. S-cone circuits in the primate retina for non-image-forming vision.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of cone spectral topography on chromatic detection sensitivity.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020
    Article
  19. The Verriest Lecture: Adventures in blue and yellow.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara S PattersonDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Maureen NeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jay NeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
VISUAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32EY007031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Wyeth Daniel Bair, Anitha Pasupathy · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
Linking retinal circuits to perceptionR01EY027859 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jay Neitz · 2018 to 2026
$4.4M
Reimbursement request for attending the Meeting of the Jointly Sponsored Institutional Predoctoral Training in the Neurosciences T32 Program Directors in Baltimore, MD on 2/19/19T32NS099578 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SULLIVAN, JANE M, WONG, RACHEL O · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027859NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007031NIH HHS P51 OD010425NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS099578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Midget retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) make up the majority of foveal RGCs in the primate retina. The receptive fields of midget RGCs exhibit both spectral and spatial opponency and are implicated in both color and achromatic form vision, yet the exact mechanisms linking their responses to visual perception remain unclear. Efforts to develop color vision models that accurately predict all the features of human color and form vision based on midget RGCs provide a case study connecting experimental and theoretical neuroscience, drawing on diverse research areas such as anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, and computer vision. Recent technological advances have allowed researchers to test some predictions of color vision models in new and precise ways, producing results that challenge traditional views. Here, we review the progress in developing models of color-coding receptive fields that are consistent with human psychophysics, the biology of the primate visual system and the response properties of midget RGCs.

Indexed as

color perceptioncolor visioncomputational visioncone photoreceptorlinking hypothesesprimate retinaretinal ganglion cells

Identifiers

PMID31474825
PMCPMC6707431
OpenAlexW2966539395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.