ArticleInternational journal of MS care
Perspectives About Time Frames in Stem Cell Research for Multiple Sclerosis: "Time Is Brain".
Article in International journal of MS care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStem cell research has been a focus of inquiry in the field of neurology for nearly 3 decades and has led to much hope for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous studies, however, demonstrate that information about the pace of developments in the stem cell arena is less accessible than are representations of potential benefits.
methodsTo explore the understanding and perspectives of adult patients with MS and MS clinicians about the time frames associated with stem cell research, we conducted semistructured interviews with 20 patients with MS across Canada and 15 clinicians who specialize in MS. Patients who participated did not have any previous stem cell interventions. Interviews were analyzed for recurring themes and individual variations using the constant comparative approach.
resultsWe found that patients with MS have a limited understanding about the time that it takes for stem cell research to reach the clinic. In parallel, they express a desire to know more than they do about the translational process. Clinicians offer strategies to address patients' questions about the pace of stem cell research and to promote informed hope about experimental interventions.
conclusionsThese results underscore opportunities to promote transparency in clinical discourse about the pace of stem cell research for MS and other progressive neurologic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.