Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473974›Full record

ArticleInfection2019

Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam significantly improves pharmacokinetic target attainment in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis of four years of clinical experience.

Daniel C Richter, Otto Frey, Anka Röhr, Jason A Roberts, Andreas Köberer, Thomas Fuchs, Nikolaos Papadimas, Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Thorsten Brenner, Christoph Lichtenstern and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Guideline-conform treatment of sepsis].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel C RichterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. daniel.richter@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1786-5919
Otto FreyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Heidenheim Hospital, Schloßhaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany.
Anka RöhrDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Heidenheim Hospital, Schloßhaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Andreas KöbererDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidenheim Hospital, Schloßhaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany.
Thomas FuchsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidenheim Hospital, Schloßhaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany.
Nikolaos PapadimasDepartment of Urology, Heidenheim Hospital, Schloßhaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany.
Monika Heinzel-GutenbrunnerMH-Statistical Consulting, Bienenweg 8, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph LichtensternDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander BrinkmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidenheim Hospital, Schloßhaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany. alexander.brinkmann@kliniken-heidenheim.de.
Heidenhain (Germany) · DEHeidelberg University · DEStatistisches Bundesamt · DETranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStandard dosing and intermittent bolus application (IB) are important risk factors for pharmacokinetic (PK) target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactams in critically ill patients, particularly in those with sepsis and septic shock. We assessed the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-guided (TDM), continuous infusion (CI) and individual dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP) on PK-target attainment in critically ill patients.

methodsThis is a retrospective, single-center analysis of a database including 484 patients [933 serum concentrations (SC)] with severe infections, sepsis and septic shock who received TDM-guided CI of PIP in the intensive care unit (ICU) of an academic teaching hospital. The PK-target was defined as a PIP SC between 33 and 64 mg/L [fT > 2-4 times the epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA)].

resultsPK-target attainment with standard dosing (initial dose) was observed in 166 patients (34.3%), whereas only 49 patients (10.1%) demonstrated target non-attainment. The minimum PK-target of ≥ 33 mg/L was overall realized in 89.9% (n = 435/484) of patients after the first PIP dose including 146 patients (30.2%) with potentially harmful SCs ≥ 100 mg/L. Subsequent TDM-guided dose adjustments significantly enhanced PK-target attainment to 280 patients (62.4%) and significantly reduced the fraction of potentially overdosed (≥ 100 mg/L) patients to 4.5% (n = 20/449). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) resulted in a relevant reduction of PIP clearance (CL

conclusionTDM-guided CI of PIP is safe in critically ill patients and improves PK-target attainment. Exposure to defined PK-targets impacts patient mortality while lower and higher than intended SCs may influence the outcome of critically ill patients. Renal function and renal replacement therapy are main determinants of PK-target attainment. These results are only valid for CI of PIP and not for prolonged or intermittent bolus administration of PIP.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical CareCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringFemaleGermanyHospitals, TeachingHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationContinuous infusionCritical illnessCustomized drug dosingPK/PDSepsisβ-lactams

Identifiers

PMID31473974
OpenAlexW2970215031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.