Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473929›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

Efficacy of ADAPT with large-bore reperfusion catheter in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: a multicentric Italian experience.

Daniele Giuseppe Romano, Giulia Frauenfelder, Tommaso Casseri, Mariangela Piano, Sergio Vinci, Alessio Comai, Alessandro Stecco, Francesco Causin, Francesco Asteggiano, Aldo Paolucci and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele Giuseppe RomanoUOC di Neuroradiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
Giulia FrauenfelderUnità di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. g.frauenfelder@unicampus.it.
Tommaso CasseriUnit of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (NINT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Mariangela PianoUnità di Neuroradiologia, Dipartimento Tecnologie Avanzate, ASST, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Sergio VinciNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphologic and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Alessio ComaiServizio Interaziendale Neuroradiologia di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Alessandro SteccoNeuroradiology Unit, AOU Maggiore della Carita', Universita' del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Francesco CausinNeuroradiology Unit, Policlinico Universitario di Padova, Padua, Italy.
Francesco AsteggianoNeuroradiology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Aldo PaolucciNeuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinico Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ComelliS.C. Radiodiagnostica, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco (ASL Città di Torino), Turin, Italy.
Andrea GiorgianniUOC Neuroradiologia, Ospedale di Circolo di Varese, Varese, Italy.
Luigi CirilloUOC Neuroradiologia, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe GanciUOC Neuroradiologia, Ospedale Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure, Italy.
Samuele CioniUnit of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (NINT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Antonio PitroneNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphologic and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Guglielmo PeroUnità di Neuroradiologia, Dipartimento Tecnologie Avanzate, ASST, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Rosario PapaNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and of Morphologic and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Mario MutoUOC di Neuroradiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, AORN A. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
Renato SaponieroUOC di Neuroradiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
Sandra BraccoUnit of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention (NINT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese · ITUniversity of Messina · ITOspedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona · ITTecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITCampus Bio Medico University Hospital · ITFondazione Audiologica Varese · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHumanitas University · ITOspedale Bellaria · ITOspedale di Bolzano · ITOspedale San Giovanni Bosco · ITOspedale Santa Corona · ITPoliclinico Universitario di Catania · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) is an alternative technique as first-line thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke, still debated when compared to first-line stent retriever. To retrospectively evaluate technical and clinical outcomes of the ADAPT as first-line treatment for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke with large-bore reperfusion catheters.

methodsA multicentric data collection from 14 medical centers was retrospectively analyzed. Large-bore catheters had a distal diameter between 0.64 and 0.71 in; stent retriever was added when aspiration alone failed. Baseline characteristics, technical and clinical variables were collected, including NIHSS, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI), peri-procedural complications, 90-day mRS and 90-day mortality.

resultsOverall, 501 patients were treated. No statistically significant difference in terms of baseline features or tPA administration was recorded between patients treated with ADAPT and with additional stent retriever. ADAPT alone was successful in achieving TICI ≥ 2b in 71.8% with a median of 1.55 aspiration attempts. In terms of TICI ≥ 2b, ADAPT alone was better than additional stent retriever (p < 0.001), while no statistical difference was achieved from catheter diameter. Embolization to a new territory was less frequent in ADAPT group (5.2 vs 18%; p = 0.0026). Patients treated with ADAPT alone had better clinical outcomes in terms of mRS ≤ 2 (p < 0.001).

conclusionsADAPT is a valid technique with respect to the rates of TICI 2b/3 recanalization and 90-day mRS scores. In this series, an attempt at recanalization with ADAPT with larger-bore reperfusion catheter may be warranted prior to stentriever thrombectomy.

Indexed as

CathetersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiography, Digital SubtractionBrain IschemiaCerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedReperfusionRetrospective StudiesStrokeAngiographyCatheterStrokeThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID31473929
OpenAlexW2970440004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.