ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2019
Utilization of an audit tool to evaluate accuracy of treatment summary and survivorship care plans.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA quality review process was implemented to determine compliance with the requirement from the Commission on Cancer to use the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) template as the minimum data set for Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plans (TS/SCP) provided to cancer survivors.
methodsTS/SCPs generated during 2017 (N = 1257) were audited for concordance with each of the 66 TS/SCP line items on ASCO's template. Descriptive statistics and chi-square statistics were used to examine line item concordance, overall and by services groups (survivorship vs. other oncology service). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of service delivery group on the concordance.
resultsInstitutional compliance with the ASCO template was very high; 76% of the 66 line items were present in at least 75% of the delivered TS/SCPs. There was a significantly higher rate of concordance for TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service (83% vs. 66%, P = 0.006). TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service were nearly twice as likely to be concordant with ASCO template (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.77-2.00) compared to those by other service groups.
conclusionsUse of the electronic medical record to auto-populate information was instrumental in achieving a high rate of concordance. Institutions should consider providing training to improve or maintain quality of these documents. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Ensuring that the information contained on the TS/SCP is consistently present is necessary for a high-quality survivorship visit between the clinician, PCP, and survivor and as a record of care for future health care encounters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31473902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.