Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473886›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2019

Pre-operative Decolonization as a Strategy to Reduce Surgical Site Infection.

Aurora Pop-Vicas, Nasia Safdar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aurora Pop-VicasDivision of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. popvicas@medicine.wisc.edu.
Nasia SafdarDivision of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo identify the most common strategies currently used for S. aureus decolonization and surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. RECENT

findingsPre-operative colonization with Staphylococcus aureus increases SSI risk. Screening and decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin and pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing remains the most common and effective strategy, especially for orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery. Intra-nasal povidone-iodine immediately before surgery appears effective in preliminary studies, is less expensive, and may be easier to implement in the clinical setting. Future well-designed clinical research studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness in SSI prevention. Intra-nasal alcohol-based antisepsis and photodynamic therapy are promising strategies that deserve further study before they can be clinically applied to SSI prevention. Decolonization with intra-nasal mupirocin or povidone-iodine, in addition to pre-operative chlorhexidine bathing, is an important SSI prevention strategy. Future studies should address optimal dosing, timing, and number of applications for each regimen.

Indexed as

MupirocinPre-operative decolonizationStaphylococcus aureusSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID31473886
OpenAlexW2970426704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.