Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473875›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2020

Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of spinal myxopapillary ependymomas.

Tie Liu, Chenlong Yang, Xiaofeng Deng, Anqi Li, Yu Xin, Jun Yang, Yulun Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Many Faces of Myxopapillary Ependymomas.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Ependymoma: Evaluation and Management Updates.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tie LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chenlong YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng DengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Anqi LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yu XinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yulun XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. xuhuxi@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-1930
Capital Medical University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal myxopapillary ependymoma (SME) is a rare pathological variant of ependymoma, which most commonly occurs in the cauda equina and filum terminale of the spinal cord. Although SME is considered as a benign entity, histologically corresponding to WHO grade I, local recurrence and metastasis have been reported in many cases. The purpose of this large-scale, single-center study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of SME. A total of 34 consecutive patients diagnosed with SME were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were treated with surgical resection. Individual clinical data were collected, and surgical outcomes were evaluated during the follow-up period. There were 21 males and 13 females, with an average age of 29.97 years. Clinical symptoms included back pain (82.4%), weakness (44.1%) and numbness (20.6%) in extremities, and sphincter dysfunction (26.5%). The tumor locations included lumbar segments (52.9%), thoracolumbar segments (23.5%), lumbosacral segments (17.6%), and thoraco-lumbo-sacral segments (5.9%). On MRI, all SMEs appeared hypointense on T1-weighted imaging and hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging, with remarkable enhancement. Gross total resection was achieved in 18 patients, and subtotal resection (STR) was achieved in 16 patients. After an average follow-up period of 41.5 months, recurrence was noted in 5 patients (5 of 16) who underwent STR. SMEs have some characteristic features on MRI which can facilitate the preoperative diagnosis. Complete surgical resection is the best treatment of choice with a favorable outcome. In cases of incomplete resection, postoperative radiotherapy may be an effective alternative.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCombined Modality TherapyEpendymomaFemaleHumansLumbosacral RegionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNeurosurgical ProceduresPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord NeoplasmsMRIMyxopapillary ependymomaPrognosisSpinal tumorSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID31473875
OpenAlexW2971176069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.