ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2019
Lessons from Suppressive Therapy and Periodic Presumptive Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis.
Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotics reduce the recurrence of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in Chinese women.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Protection and Risk: Male and Female Genital Microbiota and Sexually Transmitted Infections.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSuppressive therapy and periodic presumptive treatment (PPT) are distinct but related strategies that have been used to reduce the incidence of bacterial vaginosis (BV). Here, we review clinical trial evidence of the effectiveness of suppressive therapy and PPT to reduce BV, and discuss their roles for women who frequently experience symptomatic or asymptomatic BV. RECENT
findingsAmong women who were recently and successfully treated for symptomatic BV, suppressive therapy with twice-weekly metronidazole gel for 16 weeks reduces the likelihood of recurrent symptomatic BV and is currently recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for prevention of recurrent BV. The premise of PPT is to provide regimens used to treat BV at regular intervals to reduce the overall frequency of BV, regardless of symptoms. Three PPT trials were conducted using different routes (oral or intravaginal), doses, and frequencies of administration. Each trial demonstrated a significant reduction in BV over the course 12 months, ranging from a 10 to 45% decrease. PPT regimens that substantially reduce the frequency of BV over time could be evaluated in clinical trials to assess whether a reduced frequency of BV leads to subsequent reductions in BV-associated sequelae. While both suppressive therapy and PPT reduce BV, their impact wanes following cessation of the regimen. Given the high prevalence of BV globally and burden of adverse reproductive health outcomes among women with BV, there is a critical need for more effective treatments that produce durable shifts in the microbiota towards vaginal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.