Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473816›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2019

[Dronabinol in geriatric pain and palliative care patients : A retrospective evaluation of statutory-health-insurance-covered outpatient medical treatment].

Christoph Wendelmuth, Stefan Wirz, Misel Torontali, Anne Gastmeier, Knud Gastmeier

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christoph WendelmuthZentrum für ambulantes Operieren, Spezielle Schmerztherapie und Palliativmedizin, Praxis Gastmeier, Karl-Marx-Str. 42, 14482, Potsdam, Deutschland. christoph.wendelmuth@web.de.
Stefan WirzAbteilung für Anästhesie, Intensiv‑, Schmerz- und Palliativmedizin; Zentrum für Schmerzmedizin; Weaningzentrum, GFO-Kliniken Bonn, Cura Bad Honnef, Schülgenstraße 15, 53604, Bad Honnef, Deutschland.
Misel TorontaliZentrum für ambulantes Operieren, Spezielle Schmerztherapie und Palliativmedizin, Praxis Gastmeier, Karl-Marx-Str. 42, 14482, Potsdam, Deutschland.
Anne GastmeierZentrum für ambulantes Operieren, Spezielle Schmerztherapie und Palliativmedizin, Praxis Gastmeier, Karl-Marx-Str. 42, 14482, Potsdam, Deutschland.
Knud GastmeierZentrum für ambulantes Operieren, Spezielle Schmerztherapie und Palliativmedizin, Praxis Gastmeier, Karl-Marx-Str. 42, 14482, Potsdam, Deutschland.
Schmerzmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric patients often suffer from a long history of pain and have a limited life expectancy. Cannabinoid receptor agonists like dronabinol may be an effective, low-risk treatment option for geriatric patients with chronic pain.

objectivesThe effectiveness and side effects of dronabinol therapy in geriatric patients are analyzed. The effects of the approval requirement are presented.

methodsIn our retrospective monocentric cohort study, the study population comprised all geriatric patients over the age of 80 years who were treated in our office since the cannabis law came into effect on 10 March 2017 until 17 July 2018 (evaluation date). Geriatric, nonpalliative pain patients (group A) and geriatric palliative patients (group B) were investigated. The basis of the evaluation was a questionnaire sheet that we use in our office with details of dosages, pain intensity, treatment effects and side effects from dronabinol therapy.

resultsBy using dronabinol, 21 of the 40 geriatric patients (52.5%) achieved pain relief of more than 30%, 10% of the patients of more than 50%. On average, about four symptoms or side effects related to previous treatment were positively influenced. 26% of patients reported side effects. The rejection rates on the part of the health insurances were 38.7% (group A) and 10.3% (group B).

conclusionsThis study is one of the few analyses of the use of Dronabinol in geriatric patients. We show that cannabis-based drugs (in this case dronabinol) are an effective, low-risk treatment option that should be considered early in therapy. Regarding the indication spectrum, further clinical studies and an approval-free test phase are necessary.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareDronabinolPainPalliative CareAgedCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesDronabinolAdverse effectApprovalCannabinoidsDosing

Identifiers

PMID31473816
OpenAlexW2970994816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.