ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020
[German S3 guidelines on avoidance of coercion: prevention and therapy of aggressive behavior in adults].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Post-incident debriefing for people with schizophrenia after coercive measures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators-Lessons Learned From a Randomised Trial to Implement Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention of Coercion in Psychiatry.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Trial
- Effect of standardized post-coercion review on subjective coercion: Results of a randomized-controlled trial.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021Trial
- [Peer support in acute outreach psychiatric crisis interventions: results of a qualitative study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Article
- [Forensic-Psychiatric Consultations in General Psychiatry - Supporting Treatment of Patients Prone to Commit Violence].Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie · 2025Article
- Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint: results of a retrospective analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Reliability and validity of the German version of the Forensic Restrictiveness Questionnaire.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Effect of coercive measures on mental health status in adult psychiatric populations: a nationwide trial emulation.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- [The situation in the German forensic commitment-Results of a survey by the DGPPN].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Article
- [Cantonal Differences in The Implementation of Involuntary Admission in Switzerland].Psychiatrische Praxis · 2024Article
- Shared decision-making in post-coercion debriefing interventions in psychiatry - a scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- [The German S3 guidelines on prevention of coercion and treatment of aggressive behavior: from evidence to consensus, from consensus to implementation].Der Nervenarzt · 2023Review
- Joint Crisis Plans and Crisis Cards in Inpatient Psychiatric Treatment—a Multicenter Randomized Controlled TrialDeutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Article
- Coercion in intensive care, an insufficiently explored issue-a scoping review of qualitative narratives of patient's experiences.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2023Article
- General and Case-Specific Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in the Public Opinion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Preventing, reducing, and attenuating restraint: A prospective controlled trial of the implementation of peer support in acute psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Implementation of guidelines on prevention of coercion and violence: baseline data of the randomized controlled PreVCo study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reports on the developmental process, significance and scope of clinical practice guidelines and presents changes to the former S2 guidelines on therapeutic interventions for aggressive behavior (2010). Aggressive behavior is understood both in the context of risk characteristics on the patient side and as a result of escalating conflicts between patients and staff. If coercive measures are unavoidable, they must be carried out in the most bearable and humane way possible for all participants. For the first time these guidelines provide clear evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for these issues. In addition to prevention, de-escalation, rapid tranquilization and pharmacotherapy of acute states of agitation and of recurrent aggressive behavior, technical, legal and ethical aspects of coercive measures and therapeutic support during coercive measures are covered. Further recommendations concern measures of tertiary prophylaxis, such as debriefing, joint crisis plans and external monitoring by visiting commissions and political committees. Implementation recommendations have been formulated from the guidelines. They are currently being tested in a pilot study funded by the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN).
Indexed as
Identifiers
31473766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.