ArticleBMJ case reports2019
Duplication of 1q31.3q41 in two affected siblings due to paternal insertional translocation.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic diagnostic approach to intellectual disability and multiple congenital anomalies in Indonesia.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report two sisters with developmental delay and dysmorphic features, as well as a history of seizures. Both sisters have short stature, microcephaly and shared facial dysmorphisms. We detected an 18.1 Mb interstitial gain in 1q31.3q41 and a 140 kb interstitial loss in 7p11.2 in both siblings by using array analysis in the older sister and copy number variation analysis in whole exome sequencing data in the younger sister. We further examined parental chromosomes and found an insertional translocation in the unaffected father, having a 46,XY,ins(7;1)(p11.2;q31.3q41) karyotype. A 1.8 Mb loss at the rearranged 1q segment was subsequently detected on additional array analysis in the father, as well as the 140 kb loss in 7p11.2. We describe the clinical consequences of the 18.1 Mb duplication of the long arm of chromosome 1 due to an unbalanced paternal insertional translocation and compare these with the clinical phenotypes of patients with an overlapping 1q duplication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.