Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473621›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Quality of essential newborn care and neonatal resuscitation at health facilities in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional assessment.

Faridullah Atiqzai, Partamin Manalai, Sher Shah Amin, Karen M Edmond, Malalai Naziri, Mohammad Samim Soroush, Sharmina Sultana, Khaksar Yousufi, Thomas van den Akker, Jelle Stekelenburg and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Faridullah AtiqzaiHEMAYAT Project, Jhpiego Afghanistan, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Partamin ManalaiHEMAYAT Project, Jhpiego Afghanistan, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Sher Shah AminOffice of Health and Nutrition, USAID Afghanistan, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Karen M EdmondHealth Section, UNICEF, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Malalai NaziriHealth Section, UNICEF, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Mohammad Samim SoroushReproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Department, Ministry of Public Health, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1193-2212
Sharmina SultanaHealth Section, UNICEF, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Khaksar YousufiHealth Section, UNICEF, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Thomas van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jelle StekelenburgDepartment of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hannah TappisTechnical Leadership Office, Jhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland, USA hannah.tappis@jhpiego.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-5418
World Health Organization - Afghanistan · AFJohns Hopkins University · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLMinistry of Public Health · AFUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess readiness and quality of essential newborn care and neonatal resuscitation practices in public health facilities in Afghanistan.

designCross-sectional assessment.

setting226 public health facilities in Afghanistan, including 77 public health facilities with at least five births per day (high-volume facilities) and 149 of 1736 public health facilities with fewer than five births per day (low-volume facilities).

participantsManagers of 226 public health facilities, 734 skilled birth attendants (SBAs) working at these facilities, and 643 women and their newborns observed during childbirth at 77 high-volume health facilities. OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability of knowledgeable SBAs, availability of supplies and compliance with global guidelines for essential newborn care and neonatal resuscitation practices.

resultsAt high-volume facilities, 569/636 (87.9%) of babies were dried immediately after birth, 313/636 (49.2%) were placed in skin-to-skin contact with their mother and 581/636 (89.7%) had their umbilical cord cut with a sterile blade or scissors. A total of 87 newborn resuscitation attempts were observed. Twenty-four of the 87 (27.5%) began to breath or cry after simply clearing the airway or on stimulation. In the remaining 63 (72.5%) cases, a healthcare worker began resuscitation with a bag and mask; however, only 54 (62%) used a correct size of mask and three babies died as their resuscitation with bag and mask was unsuccessful.

conclusionsThe study indicates room for improvement of the quality of neonatal resuscitation practices at public health facilities in Afghanistan, requiring only strengthening of the current best practices in newborn care. Certain basic and effective aspects of essential newborn care that can be improved on with little additional resources were also missing, such as skin-to-skin contact of the babies with their mother. Improvement of compliance with the standard newborn care practices must be ensured to reduce preventable newborn mortality and morbidity in Afghanistan.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAfghanistanCross-Sectional StudiesHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornPublic FacilitiesResuscitationAfghanistanessential newborn carehealthcare quality assessmentneonatal resuscitationquality of healthcare

Identifiers

PMID31473621
PMCPMC6720229
OpenAlexW2970982577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.