Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473614›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

What change in body mass index is associated with improvement in percentage body fat in childhood obesity? A meta-regression.

Laura Birch, Rachel Perry, Linda P Hunt, Rhys Matson, Amanda Chong, Rhona Beynon, Julian Ph Shield

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Weight Gain after Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Metabolic syndrome in childhood cancer survivors: delta BMI a risk factor in lower-middle-income countries.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura BirchNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre-Nutrition theme, Level 3 University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
Rachel PerryNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre-Nutrition theme, Level 3 University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
Linda P HuntNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre-Nutrition theme, Level 3 University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
Rhys MatsonNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre-Nutrition theme, Level 3 University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
Amanda ChongNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre-Nutrition theme, Level 3 University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
Rhona BeynonNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre-Nutrition theme, Level 3 University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.
Julian Ph ShieldNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre-Nutrition theme, Level 3 University Hospitals Bristol Education Centre, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUsing meta-regression this paper sets out the minimum change in body mass index-SD score (BMI-SDS) required to improve adiposity as percentage body fat for children and adolescents with obesity.

designMeta-regression.

settingStudies were identified as part of a large-scale systematic review of the following electronic databases: AMED, Embase, MEDLINE via OVID, Web of Science and CENTRAL via Cochrane library.

participantsIndividuals aged 4-19 years with a diagnosis of obesity according to defined BMI thresholds.

interventionsStudies of lifestyle treatment interventions that included dietary, physical activity and/or behavioural components with the objective of reducing obesity were included. Interventions of <2 weeks duration and those that involved surgical and/or pharmacological components (eg, bariatric surgery, drug therapy) were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To be included in the review, studies had to report baseline and post-intervention BMI-SDS or change measurements (primary outcome measures) plus one or more of the following markers of metabolic health (secondary outcome measures): adiposity measures other than BMI; blood pressure; glucose; inflammation; insulin sensitivity/resistance; lipid profile; liver function. This paper focuses on adiposity measures only. Further papers in this series will report on other outcome measures.

resultsThis paper explores the potential impact of BMI-SDS reduction in terms of change in percentage body fat. Thirty-nine studies reporting change in mean percentage body fat were analysed. Meta-regression demonstrated that reduction of at least 0.6 in mean BMI-SDS ensured a mean reduction of percentage body fat mass, in the sense that the associated 95% prediction interval for change in mean percentage body fat was wholly negative.

conclusionsInterventions demonstrating reductions of 0.6 BMI-SDS might be termed successful in reducing adiposity, a key purpose of weight management interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016025317.

Indexed as

AdiposityBody Mass IndexPediatric ObesityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRegression AnalysisSystematic Reviews as TopicWeight Lossadolescencebody fatbody mass indexchildhoodobesity

Identifiers

PMID31473614
PMCPMC6720247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.