Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31473274›Full record

ReviewAppetite2020

Changes in taste function and ingestive behavior following bariatric surgery.

Katie Nance, M Belén Acevedo, M Yanina Pepino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Appetite, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie NanceDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, 905 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. Electronic address: maryn2@illinois.edu.
M Belén AcevedoDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, 905 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. Electronic address: mba17@illinois.edu.
M Yanina PepinoDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, 905 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA; Division of Nutritional Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, 905 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. Electronic address: ypepino@illinois.edu.

Funding

PHARMACOKINETICS AND SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO ALCOHOL AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERYR01AA024103 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARTA YANINA PEPINO DE GRUEV · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity and its related comorbidities. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) are currently the most popular weight-loss surgeries used worldwide. Following these surgeries, many patients self-report changes in taste perception and decreased preference for unhealthy foods. These reported changes might account for increased adherence to healthier diets and successful weight loss after surgeries. However, researchers have used a variety of methodologies to assess patients' reported changes andresults are discrepant. The goal of this review is to summarize the literature regarding changes to taste function and ingestive behavior following RYGB and SG to examine differences in findings by methodology (indirect vs. direct measurements). We focused our review around changes in sweets, fats, and alcohol because most of the documented changes in ingestive behavior post-surgery are related to changes in these dietary items. We found that studies using surveys and questionnaires generally find that subjects self-report changes in taste and decrease their preference and cravings for energy-dense foods (particularly, sweets and high-fats). However, studies using validated sensory techniques that include oral sampling or by using direct food intake measurements find little to no change in subjects' ability to perceive taste or their preference for energy-dense foods. Therefore, reported changes in taste and food preferences are unlikely to be explained by alterations in taste intensity and diet selection, and are rather related to changes in the rewarding value of food. Further, that RYGB, and likely SG, is associated with increased alcohol consumption and arisk to develop an alcohol use disorder) supports the notion that these surgeries alter central circuits of reward that are critical in the regulation of ingestive behavior.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric BypassTaste PerceptionAdultCravingDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative PeriodRewardWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID31473274
PMCPMC6954963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.