ReviewPsychiatry research2020
Quantitative approaches for the evaluation of implementation research studies.
Review in Psychiatry research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04321876 (Evaluation of a Collaborative Behavioral Health Program Implementation in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of a Collaborative Behavioral Health Program Implementation in Primary Care
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Implementation Research on Determinants and Strategies of Effective HIV Interventions for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States.Annual review of psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Stepped Care Approach to Promoting Engagement in a Digital Health Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- User journey method: a case study for improving digital intervention use measurement.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- From research to real-life implementation: an evaluation of the scale up of a guided digital mental health intervention in Lebanon: Step-by-Step.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Implementation outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial of a strategy to improve integration of behavioral health and primary care services.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- A five-phase evaluation framework for diagnostic and predictive medical artificial intelligence.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A Formative Evaluation of Parental Perceptions Related to Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility, and Reported Use of an e-Learning Resource Targeting Diet in the First 1000 Days: Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Culturally Engaged REcovery - MOms connected through Native CommunitY (CEREMONY): An Implementation Study to Evaluate the Adaptation and Implementation of an Integrated Perinatal SUD Clinical Model for Pregnant and Postpartum Native People.Substance use & addiction journal · 2026Article
- Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation studies: why and how to do them.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Protocol: Strategies to Enhance Inclusion in Informed Consent Practice for People With Vision and/or Hearing Support Needs: A Systematic Review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and application of a cost tool for a primary care-based intensive health behaviour and lifestyle treatment.Pediatric obesity · 2025Article
- Patient Voices in Dialysis Care: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study of Social Media Discourse.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- An innovative multimorbidity patient-centered care model in Chile: implementation evaluation results.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Effect of a needs-based model of care on the characteristics of healthcare services in England: the i-THRIVE National Implementation Programme.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2025Article
- A tailored intervention for the detection of patients with coronary heart disease and mental or cognitive comorbidities in the German primary care setting: qualitative evaluation of implementation success.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators to high-volume evidence-based innovation and implementation in a large, community-based learning health system.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- A mixed methods evaluation of patient perspectives on the implementation of an electronic health record-integrated patient-reported symptom and needs monitoring program in cancer care.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implementation research necessitates a shift from clinical trial methods in both the conduct of the study and in the way that it is evaluated given the focus on the impact of implementation strategies. That is, the methods or techniques to support the adoption and delivery of a clinical or preventive intervention, program, or policy. As strategies target one or more levels within the service delivery system, evaluating their impact needs to follow suit. This article discusses the methods and practices involved in quantitative evaluations of implementation research studies. We focus on evaluation methods that characterize and quantify the overall impacts of an implementation strategy on various outcomes. This article discusses available measurement methods for common quantitative implementation outcomes involved in such an evaluation-adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, reach, and sustainment-and the sources of such data for these metrics using established taxonomies and frameworks. Last, we present an example of a quantitative evaluation from an ongoing randomized rollout implementation trial of the Collaborative Care Model for depression management in a large primary healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.